期刊文献+

欧盟碳边境调节机制与WTO规则的合规性问题分析

Analysis on the Compliance of EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism and WTO Rules
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为减少碳泄漏,推进《欧洲绿色协议》的实施,欧盟委员会于2022年6月通过了建立碳边境调节机制的提案。欧盟碳边境调节机制作为一种以环境保护为导向的单边贸易措施,其与WTO贸易规则的合规性问题一直存有诸多争议。从欧盟碳边境调节机制的草案内容来看,其仍存在不符合最惠国待遇原则与国民待遇原则之嫌,并且这种碳边境调节机制的实施方式,构成一种任意或不合理的歧视,欧盟若想通过援引一般例外条款得到豁免存在难度。在此背景下,我国应坚持多边主义,加强气候变化的国际合作,在WTO框架下解决争议。同时,我国还应与欧盟展开双边磋商和谈判,争取我国产品出口到欧盟在碳边境调节机制下的豁免。 In order to reduce carbon leakage and advance the implementation of the European Green Deal,the European Commission adopted in June 2022 a proposal to establish a carbon border reconciliation mechanism.As a unilateral trade measure oriented towards environmental protection,the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism has been the subject of much controversy regarding its compliance with WTO trade rules.The draft of EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism is still incompatible with the MFN and national treatment principles and is implemented in a manner that constitutes arbitrary or unreasonable discrimination,making it difficult for the EU to obtain exemptions by invoking the general exceptions.In this context,China should adhere to multilateralism,strengthen international cooperation on climate change and resolve disputes under the WTO framework.At the same time,China should also start bilateral consultations and negotiations with the EU to seek exemptions for exports of our products to the EU under the carbon border adjustment mechanism.
作者 尹宏淇 YIN Hongqi(Law School,Hunan Normal University,Changsha 410081,China)
出处 《邵阳学院学报(社会科学版)》 2023年第3期34-40,共7页 Journal of Shaoyang University:Social Science Edition
基金 湖南省社科基金项目(20YBA157) 湖南省教育厅项目(20K076)。
关键词 欧盟碳边境调节机制 WTO 最惠国待遇 国民待遇 一般例外 EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism WTO most-favored-nation treatment national treatment general exception
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献93

  • 1王贵国.欧盟关税优惠案对发展中国家的影响[J].时代法学,2004,2(5):19-23. 被引量:1
  • 2俞海山.碳关税:发达国家与发展中国家的博弈[J].学习与探索,2015(3):102-106. 被引量:10
  • 3那力,李海英.WTO框架中的PPMs问题[J].法学论坛,2002,17(4):40-45. 被引量:17
  • 4陈少英.《生态税法论》,北京大学出版社2008年版,第199页.
  • 5《经济参考报》2010.3.5.第12版.
  • 6Reuven S. Avi - Yonah and David M. Uhlmann, Combating Global Climate Change: Why a Carbon Tax Is a Better Response to Global Warming than Cap and Trade, Stanford Environmental Law Journal, 2009, Vol. 28, p.3.
  • 7Section 765 of S1733 of House of Representatives Draft of American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009.
  • 8Michael J. Zimmer, Carbon Tax: Ready for Prime Time?, Sustainable Development Law & Policy, 2007 - 2008, Vol.8, p.67.
  • 9Gilert E. Metealf and David Weisbach, The Design of a Carbon Tax, Harvard Environmental Law Review, 2009, Vol. 33, p. 500.
  • 10http://www, wtocenter, org. tw/SmartKMs/do/www/readDoe? doeument-id = 102261,2010年3月10日访问.

共引文献86

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部