期刊文献+

等效原则:在线民事诉讼合法性的规范基础

Principle of Equal Legal Effect:Basic Rule for the Legality of Online Civil Litigation
原文传递
导出
摘要 等效原则确立了在线民事诉讼合法性的规范基础,具有指引在线民事诉讼制度设计的功能,也是程序选择权的重要基础。其核心要义在于在线民事诉讼程序的运行应当保障司法公正的实现、在线民事诉讼与线下民事诉讼具有功能等值性以及在线实施的民事诉讼行为不需要线下重新实施等方面。此外,等效原则还调整着民事诉讼行为的实施。等效原则要求保障在线民事诉讼的质量;当在线民事诉讼行为存在瑕疵时,需要进行补正才能符合等效原则的要求;面对网络技术故障造成的当事人在线民事诉讼行为迟误,应当允许当事人补行相应民事诉讼行为,补行的民事诉讼行为应当被视为是及时作出的。 The principle of equal legal effect is the basic rule for the legality of online civillitigation.Ithas the function of guiding the design of online civil litigation system,and is also the important basis of procedure option right.The core meaning of the principle reflects in the following aspects.Firstly,online civil litigation should ensure the realization of justice;secondly,online civil litigation and scene civillitigation have equivalent functionality;thirdly,the principle also regulates the implementation of civil procedural actions.If the civil pro-cedural actions have been implemented online,there is no need to be re-implemented on the scene.Addition-ally,this principle regulates the implementation of civil proceduralactions which requires that the quality of on line civil litigation should be guaranteed.When there are flaws in online procedural actions,it is necessary to make corections to comply with the principle of equal legal ffect;if the delay of parties'online civil procedural actions is caused by technical failures,the parties should be allowed to make up the coresponding civil proce-dural actions,and the supplementary civil procedural actions are deemed to be implemented timely.
作者 王庆宇 WANG Qingyu(School of Law,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210023,Jiangsu,China)
出处 《昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2023年第3期26-31,共6页 Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
关键词 等效原则 合法性 规范基础 核心要义 在线民事诉讼行为 principle of equal legal effect legality basic nule core meaning online civil procedural action
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献67

  • 1齐树洁,周一颜.司法改革与接近正义——写在民事诉讼法修改之后[J].黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报,2013(1):1-5. 被引量:10
  • 2[德]罗森贝克等.《德国民事诉讼法》(上).李大雪译,中国法制出版社,2007年版.第230页.
  • 3杨建文:《韩国民事电子诉讼制度的发展》,《人民法院报》2013年5月3日,第8版.
  • 4周强:《尽快建成法院信息化3.0版,促审判现代化》,《法制日报》2016年2月24日,第1版.
  • 5《吉林电子法院“e”流程变革审判方式》,2015年11月4日,司法版.
  • 6http://www.zjwsft.gov.cn.
  • 7Femando Gasc6n Inchausti , Electronic Service of Documents National and International Aspects, Mikl6s Kengyel & Zoltdn Nemess6nyi (ed) , Electronic Technology and Civil Procedure, Springer (2012 ), p. 137.
  • 8E -committee Supreme Court Of India Policy and Action Plan Document Phase II of The E - courts Project (as approved on 8th January, 2014) .
  • 9Policy and Action Plan Document Phase lI of the eCourts Project.
  • 10Francesco Contini & Giovan Francesco Lanzara, The Circulation of Agency in E- Justice, Springer 2014, p. 229.

共引文献272

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部