期刊文献+

团队何以愈挫弥坚?领导正念对团队韧性形成的影响 被引量:2

What enables teams to“bounce back”from adversity?The influence of leader mindfulness on team resilience
下载PDF
导出
摘要 动荡商业环境中,团队成功抵御风险、迅速恢复甚至实现成长的关键在于团队韧性。团队韧性既是团队在逆境中反弹的一种能力,也是一种动态心理过程,亦是一种共享信念。现有团队层面的韧性研究相对匮乏且以能力观占据主导,忽视了其动态发展和共识涌现,且前因研究较少关注领导特征。研究整合能力观、过程观和共识观三种视角,刻画领导正念影响团队韧性形成的内在机制与边界条件。研究发现为团队如何在逆境之中摧而不垮甚至愈挫弥坚提供了较为全面的理论整合框架和管理实践策略。 Team resilience is the key to successful risk response,rapid recovery,and even growth in a crisis.It has been pointed out that team resilience is not only the capacity of a team to bounce back from adversity,but also a dynamic psychological process and a shared belief.Research on team resilience is scant.The limited literature on team resilience falls short on two points.First,the capacity perspective dominates the research,ignoring the dynamic development and the emergence of shared belief in team resilience.Second,antecedent research pays little attention to leader characteristics.Against this backdrop,the current research attempts to characterize the influence mechanism of leader mindfulness on team resilience from capacity,process,and belief perspectives.This study will deepen and expand the research on leader mindfulness and team resilience,and provide practical strategies for teams to survive adversity.
作者 刘贝妮 张志学 LIU Beini;ZHANG Zhixue(Business School,Beijing Technology and Business University,Beijing 100048,China;Guanghua School of Management,Peking University,Beijing 100871,China)
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2023年第7期1146-1159,共14页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(72202007) 教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目(22YJC630082)资助。
关键词 领导正念 团队韧性 能力观 过程观 共识观 leader mindfulness team resilience capacity psychosocial process shared belief
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献77

  • 1李平,竺家哲.组织韧性:最新文献评述[J].外国经济与管理,2021(3):25-41. 被引量:154
  • 2郭海燕,张连营,洪帅,黄珊珊.知识领导力视角下亲社会化意义建构机制对知识隐藏意愿的影响[J].管理学报,2020,0(1):111-120. 被引量:12
  • 3李超平,时勘.变革型领导的结构与测量[J].心理学报,2005,37(6):803-811. 被引量:471
  • 4刘永强,赵曙明.影响工作-家庭冲突的因素及其平衡策略[J].中国人力资源开发,2006,23(9):11-16. 被引量:16
  • 5Baldwin, S. A., & Fellingham, G. W. (2013). Bayesian methods for the analysis of small sample multilevel data with a complex variance structure. Psychological Methods, 18, 151-164.
  • 6Bemstein, E. S. (2012). The transparency paradox: A role for privacy in organizational learning and operational control. Administration Science Quarterly, 57, 181-216.
  • 7Chua, R. Y. J., Roth, Y., & Lemoine, J.-F. (2015). The impact of culture on creativity: How cultural tightness and cultural distance affect global innovation crowdsourcing work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 60, 189-227.
  • 8Contractor, N. S., DeChurch, L. A., Carson, J., Carter, D. R., & Keegan, B. (2012). The topology of collective leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 994-1011.
  • 9Kozlowski, S, W. J., Chao, G~ T., Grand, J. A., Braun, M. T., & Kuljanin, G. (2013). Advancing multilevel research design: Capturing the dynamics of emergence. Organizational Research Methods, 16, 581-615.
  • 10Lanaj, K., Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., Barnes, C. M., & Hormon, S. J. (2013).The double-edged sword of decentralized planning in multiteam systems. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 735-757.

共引文献215

同被引文献35

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部