期刊文献+

国际调查与本土求证:上海教师的专业自主

International Comparison and Local Survey:Teacher Autonomy in Shanghai
下载PDF
导出
摘要 教师专业自主,即教师作为专业人士,在其专业领域行使的专业判断、专业决定的权利和自由。TALIS2018数据显示,上海教师在班级教学自主方面位于国际前列,但在参与学校决策方面的自主仍相对落后。为弥补TALIS对教师专业自主调查的不全面,研究者开发了教师专业自主的本土调查工具。研究发现,教师专业自主的呈现符合统计学指标,具有“三层六维度”的特点,专业基础和同伴网络对上海初中教师专业自主具有显著影响。最后,结合数据分析得出启示:把握教师在其专业领域行使的自主尺度;探索教师课程与评价的自主空间;打通教师专业发展的自主路径。 Teacher autonomy means teachers,as professionals,exercise the right and freedom of making professional judg⁃ments and decisions in their relevant field.According to the survey data from TALIS 2018,class autonomy in Shanghai ranks among the top internationally,but school decision-making autonomy is still relatively backward.To make up for the incomplete survey from TALIS on teacher autonomy,this study develops a tool of local survey for teacher autonomy.The study shows that teacher autonomy in Shanghai is of statistical significance and has the feature of“three layers and six dimensions”.It also finds that there exists significance between teacher autonomy and peer network and professional foundation.Finally,the conclusion can be made based on data analysis that the degree of autonomy exercised by teachers in their professional fields should be proper⁃ly held;the space of teacher autonomy in curriculum and evaluation should be explored;and the pathway to autonomy of teacher professional development should be opened.
作者 王菲 张民选 WANG Fei;ZHANG Minxuan(Institute of International and Comparative Education,East China Normal University,Shanghai,200062;Research Institute for International and Comparative Education,Shanghai Normal University,Shanghai,200233)
出处 《现代基础教育研究》 2023年第2期41-48,共8页 Research on Modern Basic Education
关键词 上海教师 专业自主 教师教学国际调查(TALIS) teachers in Shanghai teacher autonomy TALIS
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献19

  • 1罗晓杰.三级课程管理体制下教师课程决策权问题探析[J].教师教育研究,2006,18(6):25-28. 被引量:11
  • 2丁念金.论教师的课程决策意识[J].课程.教材.教法,2006,26(3):87-91. 被引量:19
  • 3吴小贻.教师专业自主权的解读及实现[J].教育研究,2006,27(7):52-55. 被引量:54
  • 4欧用生.落实学校本位的课程发展.国民教育,1999,39(4):2-7.
  • 5高强华.教师专业自主与学校教育革新专辑[M].台北:台湾师范大学出版社,1997:7.
  • 6张廷凯.课程决策与教师专业能力发展[c]//朱嘉颖,等."课程决定"(第十届两岸三地课程理论研讨会论文集).香港:香港中文大学出版社,2008:200.
  • 7Shavelson R J, Stern P. Research on teachers' pedagogical thoughts,judgment, decisions and behavior[J]. Review of Educational Research, 1981,51 (4) : 455 - 498.
  • 8Taylor D, Tashakkori A. Toward an understanding of teachers desire for participation in decision-making[J]. Journal of School Leadership, 1997,7 ( 11 ) : 609- 628.
  • 9冯洁皓,林智中.香港幼稚园老师的课程决策:专业自主与市场导向[M]//朱嘉颖,等.“课程决定”(第十届两岸三地课程理论研讨会论文集).香港:香港中文大学出版社,2008:255.
  • 10M Frances Klein. A conceptual Framework for Curriculum Decision Making[C]. In: M Frances Klein, Albany, eds. The Politics of curriculum Decision-Making. State University of New York Press, 1991:31-36.

共引文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部