期刊文献+

美国整体政府方法的人工智能战略及应对研究 被引量:3

A Study of AI Strategies and Responses to the U.S.Whole-of-Government Approach
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过文献分析研究美国的人工智能战略,以政府的三重角色透视美国政府在人工智能发展中的作用。美国以整体政府方法推进人工智能,建立多层次的联邦战略框架,构建跨部门正式机制。美国政府承担着人工智能投资者、使用者、监管者的多重角色,促进在重点领域投资研发人工智能,优先在政府部门中采用人工智能,并保持宽松的监管以防止阻碍创新。美国整体政府方法的人工智能是其“整体政府”对华战略的投射,背后有其深刻思想根源。美国将人工智能看作国家安全的核心,有一种技术领导地位的迷思,也是对历史经验的路径依赖。拜登政府进一步强化了同盟战略,将与中国的人工智能技术之争塑造为民主与专制之争,把对中国的抹黑攻击,视为拉拢盟国的机会。中国基于人类命运共同体和国家总体安全观理念发展人工智能,增进全人类共同福祉,为世界人工智能发展所依赖的经济社会背景注入多样性。我国在人工智能的发展上,要采取审慎的监管策略,要在政府部门逐步建立起人工智能能力,系统地规划产业政策,推进人工智能教育和劳动力培养,积极参与全球人工智能治理,发挥举国体制优势,集中资源取得颠覆性技术领先优势。要增强自身反制能力,加强国际传播能力建设,提升国际话语权。 The literature analysis method is used to study the artificial intelligence strategy of the U.S.government,and the role of the U.S.government in artificial intelligence is viewed from the perspective of the triple role of the government.It was found that the United States promoted AI in a whole-of-government manner,established a multi-level strategic framework,and built a interagency formal mechanism.The government plays the multiple role of investor,user and regulator of AI,maintaining lax regulation to prevent hindering innovation,promoting AI research and development in priority areas,and prioritizing the adoption of AI in government departments.The artificial intelligence of whole-of-government approach of the United States is the projection of its"whole-of-government"China strategy,and there are ideological roots behind it.The United States sees AI as central to national security,a myth of technological leadership,and a path dependence on historical experience.The Biden administration has further strengthened the alliance strategy,portraying the competition with China's artificial intelligence technology as a dispute between democracy and autocracy,and regards smearing and attacking China as an opportunity to gather allies.China has developed artificial intelligence based on the concept of a community with a shared future for mankind and the overall security concept of the country,enhancing the common well-being of all mankind and injecting diversity into the economic and social background on which the world's AI development depends.In the development of artificial intelligence,China should adopt a prudent regulatory strategy,gradually establish artificial intelligence capabilities in government departments,systematically plan industrial policies,promote artificial intelligence education and labor force training,actively participate in global artificial intelligence governance,give full play to the advantages of the national system,concentrate resources to obtain disruptive technology advantages.It is necessary to enhance our own countermeasures,and build up our capabilities in international communication,amplify our voices on the international stage.
作者 谢刚 池忠军 Xie Gang;Chi Zhongjun(School of Public Administration,China University of Mining and Technology,Xuzhou 221116;School of Marxism,China University of Mining and Technology,Xuzhou 221116)
出处 《重庆社会科学》 CSSCI 2023年第6期91-107,共17页 Chongqing Social Sciences
基金 国家社会科学基金项目“新时代社会治理共同体建构研究”(20BKS069) 江苏省高校哲学社会科学基金项目“社会治理的智治进路研究”(2022-12389) 江苏省社科应用研究精品工程课题重点资助项目“党建引领下的苏北城乡社会智治操作模式研究”(22SYA-041)。
关键词 整体政府 人工智能 美国 Whole-of-Government Artificial Intelligence United States
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献112

  • 1封凯栋,姜子莹,赵亭亭.国家工业理解能力:基于中国铁路机车与汽车产业的比较研究[J].社会学研究,2021(3):91-113. 被引量:9
  • 2张景旭,刘佳雁.剖析美国《与台湾关系法》[J].台湾研究,1999(2):60-67. 被引量:6
  • 3姜奇平.“新技术民族主义”将兴起——技术强国路线图分析之二[J].互联网周刊,2004(21):72-73. 被引量:3
  • 4翟志宏.阿奎那理性神学基本特征论析[J].武汉大学学报(人文科学版),2007,60(3):303-307. 被引量:4
  • 5Halligan, J. (2004). Regeneration in an International Context, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 64 (2) : 10 - 12.
  • 6Halligan, J. (2005a). Public Management and Departments: Contemporary Themes - Future Agendas. Australia Journal of Public Administration, 84 (1): 1-15.
  • 7Halligan, J. (2005b). Public Sector Retorm. In C. Aulich and R. Wettenhall (eds.) , Howard's Second and Third Governments. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.
  • 8Halligan, J. (2006). The Reassertion of the Centre in a First Generation NPM System. In T. Christensen and P. Laegreid (eds.), Autonomy and regulation: Coping with agencies in the modem state. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar (forthcoming).
  • 9Halligan, J. and J. Adams (2004). Security, capacity and post -market reforms: Public management change in 2003. Australia Journal of Public Administration, 63 ( 1 ) : 85 - 93.
  • 10Hood, C. (2002). The Risk Game and the Blame Game. Government and Opposition, 37 ( 1 ) : 15 - 37.

共引文献514

同被引文献57

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部