期刊文献+

盐酸罗哌卡因联合舒芬太尼硬膜外麻醉在无痛分娩中的临床效果

Clinical effect of Ropivacaine Hydrochloride combined with Sufentanil epidural anesthesia in painless delivery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨盐酸罗哌卡因联合舒芬太尼硬膜外麻醉在无痛分娩中的临床效果。方法选取2022年1月至2023年1月邹城市人民医院收治的76例行无痛分娩的产妇,按照随机数字表法分为参照组和试验组,每组各38例。参照组予以盐酸罗哌卡因,试验组予以盐酸罗哌卡因联合舒芬太尼。比较两组镇痛效果及镇痛相关指标。结果试验组镇痛效果优于参照组(P<0.05)。试验组起效时间及完全阻滞时间短于参照组,持续时间长于参照组(P<0.05)。结论盐酸罗哌卡因联合舒芬太尼硬膜外麻醉应用于无痛分娩的镇痛效果显著,药物起效较快,持续时间更长,值得临床推广。 Objective To investigate the clinical effect of Ropivacaine Hydrochloride combined with Sufentanil epidural anesthesia in painless delivery.Methods From January 2022 to January 2023,76 pregnant women who underwent painless delivery in Zoucheng People’s Hospital were selected and divided into the reference group and the experimental group according to the random number table method,with 38 cases in each group.The control group was given Ropivacaine Hydrochloride,and the experimental group was given Ropivacaine Hydrochloride combined with Sufentanil.The analgesic effect and analgesic related indexes were compared between the two groups.Results The analgesic effect of the experimental group was better than that of the reference group(P<0.05).The onset time and complete block time of the experimental group was shorter than that of the reference group,and the duration of the experimental group was longer than that of the reference group(P<0.05).Conclusion Ropivacaine Hydrochloride combined with Sufentanil epidural anesthesia for painless delivery has a significant analgesic effect.It takes effect faster and lasts longer,which is worthy of clinical promotion.
作者 孙大为 张艳 张凯 SUN Dawei;ZHANG Yan;ZHANG Kai(Department of Anesthesiology,Zoucheng People’s Hospital,Shandong Province,Zoucheng 273500,China)
出处 《妇儿健康导刊》 2023年第12期94-96,共3页 JOURNAL OF WOMEN AND CHILDREN'S HEALTH GUIDE
关键词 无痛分娩 硬膜外麻醉 盐酸罗哌卡因 舒芬太尼 Painless delivery Epidural anesthesia Ropivacaine Hydrochlor ide Sufentanil
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

二级参考文献190

  • 1陈红梅.罗哌卡因与舒芬太尼联合用药对于无痛分娩的麻醉效果探析[J].中国急救医学,2018,38(A01):222-222. 被引量:14
  • 2庄心良,曾因明,陈伯銮.现代麻醉学[M].3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:1086.
  • 3Saklad M. Grading of patients for surgical procedures[J]. Anesthesiology, 1941,2(3):281-284.
  • 4American Society of Anesthesiologists. New classification of physical status [J]. Anesthesiology, 1963,24(1): 111.
  • 5Wolters U, Wolf T, Stutzer H.ASA classification and perioperative variables as predictors of postoperative outcome[J]. BrJ Anesth, 1996, 77(2):217-222.
  • 6Knaus WA, Zimmerman JE, Wagner DP, et al. APACHE : a severity of disease classification system[J]. Crit Care Med,1985, 13(10):818-829.
  • 7Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M. POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit[J]. BrJ Surg, 1991, 78(3): 356-360.
  • 8Whiteley MS,Prytherch DR,Higgins B, et al. An evaluation of the POSSUM surgical scoring system [J]. Br J Surly, 1996,83 (6):812-815.
  • 9Tekkis PP, Prytherch DR, Kocher HM. Development of a dedicated risk-adjustment scoring system for colorectal surgery (colorectal POSSUM) [J]. BrJ Surg, 2004, 91(9):1174-1182.
  • 10Hartley MN, Sagar PM. The surgeon's 'gut feeling' as a predictor of post-operative outcome[J]. Ann RCoilSurg Engl, 1994, 76(6 Suppl): 277-278.

共引文献322

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部