摘要
笔者结合广西玉林抽水蓄能电站上水库枢纽布置的特点,详细介绍拟选用的导流隧洞导流、机械抽排导流以及库尾截水分流加机械抽排导流3个施工导流方案。通过技术经济比较,最终确定采用库尾截水分流加机械抽排导流方案。通过对上水库支沟进行截水分流,降低机械抽排的24 h洪量,降低汛期度汛风险,该施工导流方案对类似项目有一定的参考意义。
Based on the characteristics of the layout of the upper reservoir hub of Yulin Pumped Storage Power Station in Guangxi the authors introduce in detail the three construction diversion schemes to be selected diversion tunnel diversion mechanical pumping diversion and tail water interception diversion plus mechanical pumping diversion.Through technical and economic comparison it is finally determined to adopt the tail water interception diversion plus mechanical drainage diversion scheme.By intercepting and diverting the upper reservoir branch ditch the 24-hour flood volume of mechanical pumping is reduced and the risk of flood season is reduced.The construction diversion scheme has certain reference significance for similar projects.
作者
陶林
杨月凤
TAO Lin;YANG Yuefeng(China Energy Engineering Group Guangxi Electric Power Design Institute Co.Ltd.,Nanning,530007,China)
出处
《红水河》
2023年第3期22-26,共5页
Hongshui River
关键词
施工导流
机械抽排
方案比选
上水库
抽水蓄能电站
construction diversion
mechanical pumping
scheme comparison
upper reservoir
pumped storage power station