摘要
区块链存证被提交为诉讼证据已较为普遍,但是区块链存证真实性审查仍存在信任过度、技术回避、对象偏离、标准模糊等问题。在基础理论上,应从证据法学上厘清区块链存证的定位及在证据真实性上的证明逻辑;在审查方法上,建立区块链存证真实性审查方法的基本体系,防止忽视对区块链存证的工具性与电子数据本身的区分,分清存证平台性质对审查的影响;在证据规则上,可从证明责任、司法推定规则、平台资质准入三个方面,完善发挥区块链技术司法证明作用的规范基础。
It is common for block-chain storage to be submitted as litigation evidence,but there are still problems such as excessive trust,technical avoidance,object deviation,and ambiguous standards in the review of block-chain deposit.In the basic theory,the positioning of block-chain storage and the proof logic of evidence authenticity should be clarified from the evidence jurisprudence.In terms of review methods,it is necessary to establish a basic system for the verifi cation of the authenticity of block-chain deposits,prevent neglecting the distinction between the instrumentality of block-chain storage and the electronic data itself,and distinguish the impact of the nature of the deposit platform on the review;In terms of evidence rules,the normative basis for giving play to the judicial proof role of block-chain technology can be improved from three aspects:burden of proof,judicial presumption rules,and platform qualifi cation access.
出处
《中国应用法学》
2023年第3期175-182,共8页
China Journal of Applied Jurisprudence
关键词
区块链存证
证据真实性
审查规则
block-chain certifi cate storage
evidence authenticity
review rules