期刊文献+

不同负压吸引联合胸腔闭式引流术治疗自发性气胸的临床疗效

Clinical efficacy of different negative pressure suction combined with closed thoracic drainage on spontaneous pneumothorax
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探究不同负压吸引联合胸腔闭式引流术治疗自发性气胸的临床疗效。方法选取2019年1月至2020年10月本院收治的120例自发性气胸患者作为研究对象,依据双盲随机分组法分为3组,各组40例。3组均实施持续负压吸引+胸腔闭式引流术治疗,A组为低负压(-5 cmH_(2)O),B组为中负压(-10 cmH_(2)O),C组为高负压(-20 cmH_(2)O)。比较3组临床疗效、并发症发生情况、肺复张及住院等时间。结果B组治疗总有效率显著高于A组、C组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);A组、C组组间比较差异无统计学意义。B组并发症发生率显著低于A组、C组,肺复张时间及住院时间均显著短于A组、C组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);A组、C组组间并发症发生率、肺复张时间及住院时间比较差异无统计学意义。结论自发性气胸采用中负压(-10 cmH_(2)O)吸引联合胸腔闭式引流术治疗效果显著,可减少并发症的发生,加速肺复张,促进患者病情康复,值得临床推广应用。 Objective To study the clinical efficacy of different negative pressure suction combined with closed thoracic drainage on spontaneous pneumothorax.Methods 120 patients with spontaneous pneumothorax admitted to our hospital from January 2019 to October 2020 were selected as subjects,and they were divided into three groups according to double blind random grouping method,with 40 cases in each group.All three groups were treated with continuous negative pressure suction+closed thoracic drainage.Group A had low negative pressure(-5 cmH_(2)O),Group B had medium negative pressure(-10 cmH_(2)O),and Group C had high negative pressure(-20 cmH_(2)O).The clinical efficacy,complications,lung recruitment time and hospitalization time were compared among the three groups.Results The total effective rate of group B was significantly higher than that of group A and group C(P<0.05);There was no significant difference between group A and group C.The incidence of complications in group B was significantly lower than that in group A and group C,and the time of lung recruitment and hospitalization were significantly shorter than those in group A and group C(P<0.05);there was no significant difference in the incidence of complications,time of lung recruitment and hospitalization between group A and group C.Conclusion The treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax with medium negative pressure(-10 cmH_(2)O)suction combined with closed thoracic drainage is effective,which can reduce various complications,accelerate lung recruitment,and promote the recovery of patients,and is worthy of clinical application.
作者 鄂小军 吴莎 万俊 E Xiaojun;WU Sha;WAN Jun(Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery,Wuhan Yaxin General Hospital,Wuhan,Hubei,430000,China)
出处 《当代医学》 2022年第33期86-88,共3页 Contemporary Medicine
关键词 不同负压吸引 胸腔闭式引流术 自发性气胸 临床效果 Different negative pressure suction Closed thoracic drainage Spontaneous pneumothorax Clinical efficacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献45

  • 1李志东,肖谊,陈梅,张莉晖,张红艳,张玉凤,陈思宇.两种胸腔闭式引流方法治疗重症慢阻肺合并气胸的疗效观察[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2014,0(19):405-406. 被引量:3
  • 2喻学慧.胸腔闭式引流治疗自发性气胸术后的观察与护理[J].中国医药科学,2014,4(9):156-158. 被引量:16
  • 3李绍修,项秀雯,陈绍奉,安维哨.一次性吸痰管代替胸腔导管作闭式引流治疗自发性气胸33例[J].中国医师杂志,2004,6(9):1225-1226. 被引量:21
  • 4尤黎明,吴瑛.内科护理学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2011:413.
  • 5李辉.自发性气胸.现代胸外科急症学[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2006:306-309
  • 6陆再英,钟南山.内科学[M].第7版.北京:人民卫生出版社.2008:251.
  • 7Andrew Mac Duff, Anthony Arnold, John Harvey, et al. Management of spontaneous pneumothorax : British Tho- racic Society pleural disease guideline 2010 [ J]. Thorax, 2010,65(2) :18-31.
  • 8Voisin F, Sohier L, Rochas Y, et al.Ambu- latory management of large spontaneous pneumothorax with pigtail catheters. [J]. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 2014,64 (3) :222-228.
  • 9Young C S,Hwan K Y,Keon Hyon J,et al.Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax in children [J].Pediatric Surgery Internation- al,2013,29(5):505-509.
  • 10Brown S G A, Ball E L, Macdonald S P J, et al.Spontaneous pneumothorax;a multi- centre retrospective analysis of emergency treatment,complications and outcomes[J]. Internal Medicine Journal,2014,44 (5): 450-457.

共引文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部