期刊文献+

不同疝针在行腹腔镜经皮腹膜外结扎术腹股沟疝患儿中的应用效果比较

Comparison of application effects of different hernia needles in children with inguinal hernia undergoing laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal ligation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较不同疝针在行腹腔镜经皮腹膜外结扎术腹股沟疝患儿中的应用效果。方法:回顾性分析2019年1月至2022年12月该院收治的85例腹股沟疝患儿的临床资料,按应用的疝针不同将其分为对照组(n=42)和观察组(n=43)。对照组采用单钩疝针腹腔镜经皮腹膜外结扎术治疗,观察组采用双钩疝针腹腔镜经皮腹膜外结扎术治疗,比较两组临床疗效、疾病相关指标水平、疼痛程度[改良儿童疼痛行为评分量表(MPBS)]评分、治疗满意度和并发症发生率。结果:观察组治疗总有效率为96.67%(42/43),高于对照组的80.95%(34/42),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组手术时间、住院时间均短于对照组,术中出血量少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组MPBS评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组治疗满意度高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组并发症发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:双钩疝针腹腔镜经皮腹膜外结扎术治疗腹股沟疝患儿可提高治疗总有效率和治疗满意度,降低疾病相关指标水平、MPBS评分和并发症发生率,其效果优于单钩疝针腹腔镜经皮腹膜外结扎术治疗。 Objective:To compare application effect of different hernia needles in children with inguinal hernia undergoing laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal ligation.Methods:The clinical data of 85 children with inguinal hernia admitted to this hospital from January 2019 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed.According to the different hernia needles used,they were divided into control group(n=42)and observation group(n=43).The control group was treated with single hook hernia needle laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal ligation,while the observation group was treated with double hook hernia needle laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal ligation.The clinical efficacy,the diseaserelated indicator levels,the pain degree[modified children’s pain behavior scale(MPBS)]score,the treatment satisfaction,and the incidence of complications were compared between the two groups.Results:The total effective rate of treatment in the observation group was 96.67%(42/43),which was higher than 80.95%(34/42)in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The operation time and the hospitalization time of the observation group were shorter than those of the control group,the intraoperative blood loss was less than that of the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The MPBS score of the observation group was lower than that of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The treatment satisfaction of the observation group was higher than that of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Further,the incidence of complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusions:The double hook hernia needle laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal ligation in the treatment of the children with inguinal hernia can improve the total effective rate and the treatment satisfaction,and reduce the levels of disease-related indicators,the MPBS scores and the incidence of complications.Moreover,it is superior to single hook hernia needle laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal ligation.
作者 罗章伟 LUO Zhangwei(Department of Pediatric General Surgery of Shangqiu First People’s Hospital,Shangqiu 476100 Henan,China)
出处 《中国民康医学》 2023年第12期128-131,共4页 Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Health
关键词 疝针 腹股沟疝 患儿 经皮腹膜外结扎术 腹腔镜 并发症 Hernia needle Inguinal hernia Children Percutaneous extraperitoneal ligation Laparoscopy Complication
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献81

  • 1[1]Taddlo A, Katz J,Iierslch A, et al.Effect of neonatal circumcision on pain response during subsequent routine vaccination.Lancent ,1997,349:599-603.
  • 2[2]Chambers CT, Giesbrecht K, Craig KD, et al. A comparison of faces scales for the measurement of pediatric pain: children's and parents' ratings. Pain,1999 ,83:25-35.
  • 3[3]Finke W, Buttner W, Reckert S,et al. Respiratory and circulatory parameters as indicators of the postoperative analgesic demand in newborns and infants. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther, 1999 ,34:747-757.
  • 4[4]Butter W, Finke W. Analysis of behavioural and physiological parameters for the assessment of postoperative analgesic demand in newborns, infants and young children: a comprehensive report on seven consecutive studies. Paediatr Anaesth, 2000,10:303-318.
  • 5[5]Boelen-van der Loo WJ, Scheffer E, de Haan RJ,et al. Clinimetric evaluation of the Pain Observation Scale for Young Children in children aged between 1 and 4 years after ear, nose, and throat surgery. Develop Behavioral Pediatrics,1999,20: 222-227.
  • 6[6]Wilson GAM, Doyle E. Validation of three paediatric pain scores for use by parents.Anaesthesia,1996,51:1005-1007.
  • 7[7]Carbajal R, Paupe A, Hoenn E, et al.APN: evaluation behavioral scale of acute pain in newborn infants.Arch Pediatr,1997,4:623-628.
  • 8[8]Carbajal R, Chauvet X, Couderc S, et al.Randomised trial of analgesic effects of sucrose, glucose and pacifiers in term neonates. BMJ, 1999, 319: 1393-1397.
  • 9[9]Taddio A, Nulman I.A revised measure of acute pain in infants.J Pain Symptom Manage, 1995,10: 456-463.
  • 10[10]Schade JG, Joyce BA.Comparison of three preverbal scales for postoperative pain assessment in a diverse pediatric sample. J Pain Symptom Manage, 1996, 12: 348-359.

共引文献168

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部