期刊文献+

内镜下冷圈套器息肉切除术与常规息肉切除术治疗结肠息肉患者的效果比较 被引量:1

Comparison of effects of endoscopic cold snare polypectomy and conventional polypectomy on patients with colonic polyps
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较内镜下冷圈套器息肉切除术(CSP)与常规息肉切除术治疗结肠息肉患者的效果。方法:选取2019年6月至2020年6月该院收治的94例结肠息肉患者进行前瞻性研究,按照随机数字表法将其分为观察组与对照组各47例。对照组行内镜下常规息肉切除术治疗,观察组行内镜下CSP治疗。比较两组息肉切除时间、住院时间、息肉完整切除率,术前和术后1 d血清炎性因子[C反应蛋白(CRP)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)]水平,术后1、2、3 d疼痛程度[视觉模拟评分法(VAS)]评分,手术前后日常生活活动能力[Barthel指数(BI)]评分,以及并发症发生率。结果:观察组息肉切除时间、住院时间均短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组息肉完整切除率和BI评分均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组术后1 d的IL-6、CRP水平和术后1、2、3 d的VAS评分均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组并发症发生率为2.13%(1/47),低于对照组的17.02%(8/47),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:内镜下CSP治疗结肠息肉患者可缩短息肉切除时间、住院时间,提高息肉完整切除率和BI评分,降低炎性因子水平、VAS评分和并发症发生率,效果优于内镜下常规息肉切除术治疗。 Objective:To compare effects of endoscopic cold snare polypectomy(CSP)and conventional polypectomy in treatment of colon polyps.Methods:A prospective study was conducted on 94 patients with colon polyps admitted to the hospital from June 2019 to June 2020.They were divided into observation group and control group according to the random number table method,47 cases in each.The control group was treated with endoscopic conventional polypectomy,while the observation group was treated with endoscopic CSP.The polyp resection time,the hospitalization time,the complete polyp resection rate,the levels of inflammatory factors[C-reactive protein(CRP),interleukin-6(IL-6)]before and 1 day after the surgery,the pain degree[visual analogue scale(VAS)]1,2 and 3 days after the surgery,the activities of daily living scores[Barthel index(BI)]before and after the surgery,and incidence of complications were compared between the two groups.Results:The polyp resection time and the hospitalization time in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The complete resection rate and the BI score in the observation group were higher than those in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The levels of IL-6 and CRP at 1 d after the surgery and the VAS scores 1,2 and 3 d after the surgery in the observation group were lower than those in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Further,the incidence of complications of the observation group was 2.13%(1/47),which was lower than 17.02%(8/47)in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusions:Endoscopic CSP in the treatment of the patients with colonic polyps can shorten the polyp resection time and the hospitalization time,improve the complete polyps resection rate and the score of BI,and reduce the levels of inflammatory factors,the VAS scores and the complication rate.Moreover,it is superior to conventional endoscopic polypectomy.
作者 胡爱家 胡香云 洪谷俞 吴秋英 洪艳芬 HU Aijia;HU Xiangyun;HONG Guyu;WU Qiuying;HONG Yanfen(Department of Gastroenterology of Wuyuan County People’s Hospital,Shangrao 333200 Jiangxi,China)
出处 《中国民康医学》 2023年第12期145-147,共3页 Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Health
关键词 内镜 冷圈套器息肉切除术 常规息肉切除术 结肠息肉 疼痛 炎性因子 Endoscopy Cold snare polypectomy Conventional polypectomy Colon polyps Pain Inflammatory factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献76

共引文献139

同被引文献8

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部