国内外数字乡村研究现状对比分析

Comparative Analysis of Current Research Status of Digital Countryside at Home and Abroad

为探究数字乡村研究的进展和热点,客观反映不同国家、作者、研究机构以及期刊在该领域的影响力,以1991-2021年WOS数据库收录的949篇、CNKI数据库收录的1146篇有关数字乡村的文献进行分析。结果表明:(1)国外有关数字乡村研究的文献数量呈波动增长趋势,研究方向主要为基础设施建设、数字技术应用、乡村数字化教育、相关法律法规制定以及乡村旅游等,其中德国有关数字乡村文献的中介中心性最高;国内有关数字乡村的文献数量自2017年起进入快速发展期,且研究具有一定的深度和广度,主要研究方向为数字经济与乡村产业结合研究、乡村振兴背景下的数字乡村建设、数字乡村体系指标建立、数字乡村治理方法、乡村数字化转型、城乡间数字鸿沟的消除等。(2)国内外数字乡村研究领域有一定数量的高产作者,但绝大多数作者处于独立研究状态,没有明显的合作关系。(3)国外有关数字乡村研究可分为2001-2006年的研究初始阶段、2007-2014年的研究起步阶段、2015年至今的平稳发展阶段;国内有关数字乡村可研究分为2006-2007年的起始阶段、2008-2014的再起步阶段、2015-2016年的停滞阶段、2017年至今的快速发展阶段,研究热点由“新农村建设”“乡村数字治理”到“数字乡村现状及对策”“信息化共享”“信息化建设”再到“数字赋能”“智慧农业”“数字技术”“数字普惠金融”“乡村振兴”等。提出今后的研究应侧重于基础设施建设、消除数字鸿沟、健全数字乡村评价机制等,逐步形成多元化、多学科交叉互融的全要素格局。

In order to explore the progress and hotspots of digital countryside research and objectively reflect the influence of different countries,authors,research institutions,and journals in this field,949 articles indexed by the WOS database from 1991 to 2021 and 1146 articles indexed by the CNKI database related to digital rural research were analyzed.The results indicated that:(1)the number of literature on digital countryside research abroad showed a fluctuating growth trend,with research directions mainly focusing on infrastructure construction,digital technology application,rural digital education,relevant laws and regulations formulation,and rural tourism.Among them,Germany had the highest intermediary centrality in literature on digital countryside.The number of domestic literature on digital countryside had entered a rapid development period since 2017,and the research had a certain depth and breadth.The main research directions were the combination of digital economy and rural industry,the construction of digital countryside in the context of rural revitalization,the establishment of digital countryside system indicators,digital countryside governance methods,rural digital transformation,and the elimination of the digital gap between urban and rural areas.(2)There were a certain number of high-yield authors in the field of digital countryside research both domestically and internationally,but the vast majority of authors was in an independent research state and did not have obvious cooperative relationships.(3)The research on digital countryside abroad could be divided into the initial stage of research from 2001 to 2006,the initial stage of research from 2007 to 2014,and the stable development stage from 2015 to present.The domestic research on digital countryside could be divided into the initial stage from 2006 to 2007,the resurgence stage from 2008 to 2014,the stagnation stage from 2015 to 2016,and the rapid development stage from 2017 to the present.The research hotspots had shifted from new rural construction and rural digital governance to current situation and countermeasures of digital countryside,information sharing,information construction,and then to digital empowerment,smart agriculture,digital yechnology,digital inclusive finance,and rural revitalization.It was proposed that future research should focus on infrastructure construction,eliminating the digital divide,and improving the evaluation mechanism of digital rural areas,gradually forming a diversified,interdisciplinary and integrated all element pattern.