违反管辖协议的权利界分、性质认定与合目的性检验

Definition of Rights,Nature Determination and Purposiveness Testing for Breach of Jurisdiction Agreements

为推进我国违反管辖协议救济体系的进一步完善、厘清违反管辖协议适用损害赔偿救济的法律基础,以实体与程序的区分方法为视角,对违反管辖协议的性质进行了研究。首先,界分违反管辖协议的权利,应当包含当事人所订立的合同和管辖协议本身两个方面。其次,通过判断争议是否会在实质上影响案件结果来认定其性质,应当根据起主导作用的性质,将违反管辖协议认定为特殊的程序问题。最后,这种性质认定与符合法院地的公共利益、实现当事人的正当期待、追求当事人的正义对待等目的相契合。

To promote the improvement of remedies system of breach of jurisdiction agreements and clarify the legal basis for the application of damages in breach of jurisdiction agreements,this paper studies the nature of breach of jurisdiction agreements from the perspective of the method of differentiation between substance and procedure.Firstly,the rights involved in the breach of jurisdiction agreement should include two aspects:the contract concluded by the parties and the jurisdiction agreement itself.Secondly,the breach of jurisdiction agreements,based on the dominant role nature of which,should be determined as a special procedural issue,according to whether the determination will substantially affect the conclusion of the case.Finally,the determination is in line with purposes about the accordance with the public policy of the court,the realization of legitimate expectations,and the pursuit of the fair treatment.