学术引用视角下我国政府信息公开政策及其研究的互动关联分析

The Interaction and Relevance between Chinese Government Information Disclosure Policy and Related Research from the Perspective of Academic Citation

本文旨在从学术引用的视角出发,以政府信息公开政策及其学术研究成果为研究对象,从主题、引文和关联三个维度,对我国政府信息公开政策及其相关的社会科学研究的交互影响关系进行分析。研究结果表明,在主题维度上,我国学者对政府信息公开问题的研究主题和研究内容的关注焦点较为分散,并随着不同政策颁布的时间节点而迁移。在引文维度上,研究者主要通过直接引用的方式,在施引文献的引言和综述/方法/分析过程中,将政策或政策内容作为背景信息或理论依据进行引用。对《中华人民共和国政府信息公开条例》内容的引用主要集中在施引文献的前三章,具体表现为对政府信息公开的主体、范围、方式和程序四类条款内容的引用。在关联维度上,本文通过引用耦合关系构建了政府信息公开政策共现网络。研究结果显示,《中华人民共和国政府信息公开条例》和《中华人民共和国档案法》《中华人民共和国保守国家秘密法》《中华人民共和国宪法》的共现次数最多。此外,受关注程度较高的政策内容主要集中在两个方面:一是对不同政策内某一具体条款内容是否存在问题进行探讨,二是对不同政策中相关条款内容之间的关联关系进行理论辨析,其关联关系主要表现为相互支持和相互矛盾两种。

From the perspective of academic citations,this paper takes government information disclosure policies and related social science research as the main research object and analyzes the interactive relationships between them from three dimensions:topic,citation,and association.The results show that,regarding the topic dimension,Chinese scholars’focus on the research topics and research contents of government information disclosure is relatively scattered and migrates with the time nodes of different proclaimed policies.Regarding the citation dimension,researchers mainly directly cite policies or their contents as background or theoretical basis in the introduction and review/method/analysis sections.The citations to“Regulations of the People’s Republic of China on the Disclosure of Government Information”are mainly concentrated in the first three chapters,which are embodied in the citations to the subject,scope,method,and procedure of government information disclosure.Regarding the association dimension,this study constructs a co-occurrence network of government information disclosure policies by citing coupling relations.The results show that“Regulations of the People’s Republic of China on the Disclosure of Government Information,”“Archives Law of the People’s Republic of China,”“Law of the People’s Republic of China on the Preservation of State Secrets,”and“Constitution of the People’s Republic of China”have the most co-occurrences.In addition,the policy contents that have received more attention primarily focus on two aspects:the discussion as to whether there are problems with a specific clause in different policies and the theoretical analysis of the relationships between clauses in different policies,which are mainly manifested as mutually supportive or contradictory.