期刊文献+

先秦法家的忠德观及儒法忠德观的异同——以战国时期三晋法家为例

Differences and Similarities Between Confucianism and Legalists on Loyalty and Virtue in Pre-Qin Dynasty--Take the Three Jin Legalists in the Warring States Period as an Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 法家作为政治思想流派,主要出现在战国时代的诸子百家争鸣时期。在战国时期的法家代表人物中,相当多的法家思想家都与韩、赵、魏“三晋”有着深远的关系。他们或是出生于“三晋”,或曾经活跃于“三晋”的政治舞台上。法家不仅重视法、术、势,而且对政治道德也给予极大的关注,特别注重高扬忠德。与儒家广义的忠德观不同,法家的忠德观相对狭义,主要集中在忠君这一点上。通过对三晋法家代表人物忠德观的分析不难发现,法家忠德观的理论依据是建立在自私人性论基础上的,其政治定位主要奠基于君尊臣卑的君臣关系上,至于其核心内涵则完全集中在臣子对君主的绝对、片面的忠顺上。概言之,以三晋法家为代表的先秦法家学派对忠德的界定和阐扬主要集中在臣子忠君上,其根本还是服务且服从于君主以法、术、势来治国理政。因为是建立在维护君主专制这一目的之上,因此,法家的忠德观主要体现为忠君道德,且缺乏先秦儒家忠君道德那种双向性,而表现为绝对化的、单向度的忠君。 Legalism,as a school of political thought,mainly appeared in the Warring States period.Among the legalist representatives in the Warring States period,quite a number of legalists had a close relationship with the three states divided from Jin,namely,Han,Zhao and Wei because they were either born or were once active in the political stage here.Legalists not only attached importance to law,strategy and potential,but to political morality,especially to the elevation of loyalty and virtue.Different from the Confucian concept of loyalty in a broad sense,the legalist concept of loyalty in a relatively narrow sense mainly focused on the loyalty to the emperor.Through the analysis of the loyalty and virtue concept of the representatives of the Legalists of the three states,it is not difficult to find that the theoretical basis of the loyalty and virtue concept of the legalists was based on the assumption that humans by nature were selfish and political orientation that the monarch was superior to the subjects,and its core connotation was entirely concentrated on the absolute and one-sided loyalty of the subjects to the monarch.In a word,the pre-Qin legalists represented by the three Jin legalists mainly focused on the loyalty of the subjects to the monarch,which was basically to serve and obey the monarch to govern the country by law,strategy and potential.Because it was based on the purpose of maintaining the autocracy of the monarchy,the concept of loyalty of Legalists was mainly reflected in the morality of loyalty to the monarch,and it lacked the two-way nature of the Confucian morality of loyalty to the monarch in the pre-Qin Dynasty,manifested as an absolute and one-way loyalty to the monarch.
作者 桑东辉 SANG Donghui(School of Philosophy,Heilongjiang University,Harbin 150080,China)
出处 《太原师范学院学报(社会科学版)》 2023年第2期1-10,共10页 Journal of Taiyuan Normal University:Social Science Edition
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目“中华民族共同体的伦理认同研究”(20&ZD037) 国家社科基金后期资助项目“中国传统忠德变迁史研究”(19FZXB026)。
关键词 三晋 法家 忠德观 忠君道德 儒法比较 Three Jin legalists the concept of loyalty and virtue morality of loyalty comparison between Confucianism and Legalism
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献12

  • 1朱熹.四书章句集注[M].海南出版社,1992.118.
  • 2.中国大百科全书(法学)[M].北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1984.485.
  • 3王锡荣等.战国策译注·魏一[Z].长春:吉林文史出版社,1998.
  • 4张觉.韩非子全译[Z].贵阳:贵州人民出版社,1992.4,7.
  • 5侯外庐等.中国思想通史(第1卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1957.
  • 6马非百.秦史集(下)[M].北京:中华书局,1982.
  • 7郭沫若全集(历史编)(2)[M].北京:人民出版社,1982.
  • 8详见李光灿,张国华.中国法律思想通史(一)[Z].太原:山西人民出版社,1994.类似的观点还有:认为法家是“中国古代先秦诸子百家中主张‘以法治国’的一个学派。”参见中国大百科全书(法学).北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1984.97.又“法家是战国时期代表新兴地主阶级利益、主张‘以法治国’的一个学派。”详见张国华,饶鑫贤.中国法律思想史纲(上)[M].兰州:甘肃人民出版社,1987.154.
  • 9张国华,饶鑫贤.中国法律思想史纲(上)[M].兰州:甘肃人民出版社,1987.154.
  • 10.《人物志·流业篇》.,..

共引文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部