期刊文献+

肿瘤患者镇痛药物素养评估问卷的编制及信效度检验 被引量:3

Development and validation of Analgesic Medication Literacy Assessment Questionnaire for Cancer Patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的编制肿瘤患者镇痛药物素养评估问卷,为我国肿瘤患者提供有效的镇痛药物素养测评工具。方法以国际专家共识达成的药物素养定义及内涵为理论指导,通过文献回顾、患者半结构式深入访谈、德尔菲专家函询、预调查后形成问卷初稿。采用便利抽样法,对502例镇痛治疗期间的肿瘤疼痛患者进行问卷调查,对问卷进行项目分析及信效度检验。结果肿瘤患者镇痛药物素养评估问卷共29个条目,探索性因子分析共提取4个公因子,累积方差贡献率为71.978%,验证性因子分析各拟合指标均在可接受范围(χ^(2)/df=1.613,RMSEA=0.050,IFI=0.961,CFI=0.961);总问卷Cronbach′sα系数为0.940,折半信度为0.831,重测信度为0.884;问卷总的内容效度指数为0.957。结论编制的肿瘤患者镇痛药物素养评估问卷具有良好的信效度,可作为评估肿瘤患者镇痛药物素养水平的测评工具。 Objective To develop the Analgesic Medication Literacy Assessment Questionnaire for Cancer Patients,and to provide a valid tool for assessment of analgesic medication literacy in cancer patients in China.Methods Based on the definition of medication literacy reached by International experts and its connotation,a draft questionnaire was formed through literature review,semi-structured in-depth interviews with patients,Delphi expert consultation and pilot-testing.Then convenience sampling was adopted to select 502 patients on analgesic therapy for cancer pain for questionnaire survey.Item analysis and reliability and validity testing of the questionnaire were performed.Results The questionnaire comprised 4 dimensions totaling 29 items.Four common factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis,and the cumulative variance contribution of the factors was 71.978%.Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the model structure fitted well(χ^(2)/df=1.613,RMSEA=0.050,IFI=0.961,CFI=0.961).The Cronbach′sαcoefficient of the whole questionnaire was 0.940,the split-half reliability coefficient was 0.831,and the test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.884.The scale-level content validity index of the questionnaire was 0.957.Conclusion The Analgesic Me-dication Literacy Assessment Questionnaire for Cancer Patients has good reliability and validity,and it can be used as an evaluation tool measuring cancer patients′analgesic medication literacy.
作者 彭政 周莲清 王英 颜运英 李洲宁 刘华云 Peng Zheng;Zhou Lianqing;Wang Ying;Yan Yunying;Li Zhouning;Liu Huayun(The 5th Division of Gynecologic Department,Hunan Can-cer Hospital/The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine,Central South University,Changsha 410013,China)
出处 《护理学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2023年第11期104-108,共5页 Journal of Nursing Science
基金 湖南省卫生健康委科研计划课题项目(B2019082)。
关键词 肿瘤 癌痛 镇痛 药物素养 问卷开发 信度 效度 neoplasms cancer pain analgesia medication literacy questionnaire development reliability validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献47

  • 1李跃东,师东菊.家庭不合理用药现象分析[J].中国实用医药,2007,2(19). 被引量:3
  • 2孙浩林,傅华.健康素养研究进展[J].健康教育与健康促进,2010,5(3):225-229. 被引量:116
  • 3崔虹艳,胡平成,徐霜,Jeffrey Fuller,孙玫,李华艳,冯辉.慢性病保健评估量表的汉化及条目评价[J].中南大学学报(医学版),2015,40(2):188-193. 被引量:7
  • 4郝元涛,孙希凤,方积乾,吴少敏,朱淑明.量表条目筛选的统计学方法研究[J].中国卫生统计,2004,21(4):209-211. 被引量:174
  • 5Wynd CA,Schmidt B,Schaefer MA.Two quantitative approachesfor estimating content validity[J].Western J Nurs Res,2003,25(5):508–518.
  • 6Lindell MK,Brandt CJ,Whitney DJ.A revised index of interrateragreement for multi-item ratings of a single target[J].Appl PsycholMeasurem,1999,23(2):127–135.
  • 7Lawshe CH.A quantitative approach to content validity[J].Personne Psychol,1975,28(4):563–575.
  • 8Hambleton RK,Swaminathan H,Algina J,et al.Criterion-referencedtesting and measurement:Review of technical issues anddevelopments[J].Rev Educat Res,1978,48(1):11–22.
  • 9Martuza VR.Applying norm-referenced and criterion-referenced measurement in education[M].Boston:Allyn andBacon,1977:275–293.
  • 10Lynn MR.Determination and quantification of content validity[J].Nursing Res,1986,35(6):382–385.

共引文献2331

同被引文献42

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部