期刊文献+

两性霉素B对假丝酵母菌与乳杆菌生物膜作用的研究

Study on the effect of amphotericin B on the biofilm of Candida and Lactobacillus
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究两性霉素B对假丝酵母菌与乳杆菌生物膜的作用。方法选取2022年7月至8月在首都医科大学附属北京妇产医院就诊患者阴道来源的4株假丝酵母菌及4株乳杆菌,测定其不同时期生物膜形成能力,并观察其生物膜形成情况。分别测定两性霉素B对假丝酵母菌及乳杆菌的最小抑菌浓度(MIC)及最小抑制生物膜浓度(MBIC),并在扫描电镜下观察两性霉素B对上述菌生物膜的作用。结果白假丝酵母菌及卷曲乳杆菌生物膜形成能力48 h高于24 h(P<0.05),7号乳杆菌生物膜形成能力48 h高于72 h(P<0.05)。两性霉素B对白假丝酵母菌的MIC值为0.12500μg/ml;1、3、4号假丝酵母菌在两性霉素B浓度为2μg/ml时生物膜形成能力低于阳性对照组(两性霉素B浓度为0μg/ml时)(P<0.05),均与后续各浓度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),两性霉素B对白假丝酵母菌的MBIC值为2μg/ml。两性霉素B对卷曲乳杆菌无抑制作用;除7号乳杆菌在两性霉素B浓度为1、8、16μg/ml时生物膜形成能力高于阳性对照组(P<0.05)外,其余各卷曲乳杆菌在各浓度生物膜形成能力与阳性对照组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论白假丝酵母菌及卷曲乳杆菌在48 h生物膜形成能力最强。两性霉素B对白假丝酵母菌有较强抑菌能力,但对已形成生物膜的白假丝酵母菌需更大剂量才有破坏生物膜的作用。对卷曲乳杆菌无抑制及生物膜破坏作用。 Objective To study the effect of amphotericin B on Candida and Lactobacillus biofilm.Methods From July 2022 to August 2022,four strains of Candida and four strains of Lactobacillus from the vagina of patients in Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital,Capital Medical University were selected to determine their biofilm formation ability at different stages and observe their biofilm formation.The minimum inhibitory concentration(MIC)and minimum biofilm inhibitory concentration(MBIC)of amphotericin B on Candida and lactobacillus were determined respectively,and the effect of amphotericin B on the biofilms was observed under scanning electron microscope.Results The biofilm formation ability of Candida and Lactobacillus at 48 h was higher than that at 24 h(P<0.05),and the biofilm formation ability of Lactobacillus No.7 at 48 h was higher than that at 72 h(P<0.05).The MIC of amphotericin B against Candida albicans was 0.12500μg/ml.When the concentration of amphotericin B was 2μg/ml,the biofilm forming ability of Candida No.1,No.3 and No.4 was lower than that of the positive control group(amphotericin B 0μg/ml)(P<0.05),and there was no difference between them and the subsequent concentrations(P>0.05),the MBIC of amphotericin B against Candida albicans was 2μg/ml.Amphotericin B had no inhibitory effect on Lactobacillus crispatus.The biofilm forming ability of Lactobacillus No.7 at concentration of 1,8,and 16μg/ml was higher than that of positive control group(P<0.05),and the other Lactobacillus crispatus had no difference in biofilm forming ability at different concentrations(P>0.05).Conclusion Candida albicans and Lactobacillus crispatus had the strongest biofilm forming ability at 48 h.Amphotericin B has strong antibacterial ability to Candida albicans,but it needs a larger dose to destroy the biofilms of Candida albicans which have formed.It has no inhibitory effect on Lactobacillus crispatus and biofilms destructive effect.
作者 尚翔 白会会 刘朝晖 SHANG Xiang;BAI Huihui;LIU Zhaohui(Department of Gynecology,Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital,Capital Medical University Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital,Beijing 100026,China;Department of Clinical Laboratory,Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital,Capital Medical University Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital,Beijing 100026,China)
出处 《中国医药导报》 CAS 2023年第16期4-10,共7页 China Medical Herald
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(81771530) 首都医科大学附属北京妇产医院“学科带头人”计划专项经费资助项目(XKDTR201803)。
关键词 两性霉素B 假丝酵母菌 乳杆菌 生物膜 Amphotericin B Candida Lactobacillus Biofilm
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献22

  • 1吕文英,黄晖,王岚.女性生殖道感染与阴道菌群失调的关系及治疗[J].中国微生态学杂志,2007,19(2):233-235. 被引量:73
  • 2Ono F,Yasumoto S.Genital candidiasis[J].Nippon Rinsho, 2009, 67(1):157-161.
  • 3Pelletier G, Ouellet J, Martel C, et al. Androgenic action of dehy- droepiandrosterone (DHEA) on nerve density in the ovariecto- mized rat vaginal[J]. J Sex Med, 2013,10(8):1908-1914.
  • 4Ariyadi B, Isobe N,Yoshimura Y. Induction of mucin expression by estrogen and lipopolysaccharide in the lower oviductal seg- ments in hens[J]. Pouh Sci,2013, 92(12):3205-3213.
  • 5Srinivasan L,Kenneth J.Antibiotic susceptibility of Candida iso- lates in a tertiary care hospital in Southern India[J].Indian J Med Microbiol,2006,24(1):80-81.
  • 6Slisz M, Cybulska B, Grzybowska J, et al. The mechanism of overcoming multidrug resistance(MDR) of fungi by amphotericin B and its derivative [J]. J Antiblot (Tokyo), 2007, 60 (7): 426-446.
  • 7Palacios DS, Dailey I, Siebert DM, et al. Synthesis enabled func- tional group deletions reveal key underpinnings of amphotericin B ion channel and antifungal activities [J]. Proc Natl Aead Sei U S A, 2011,108(17): 6733-6738.
  • 8Gray KC, Palacios DS, Dailey I, et al. Amphotericin primarily kills yeast by simply binding ergosterol [J]. Proc Natl Aead Sci U S A, 2012,109(7): 2234-2239.
  • 9Sokol-Anderson ML, Brajburg J, Medoff G. Amphotericin B-in- duced oxidative damage and killing of Candida albicans[J]. J Infect Dis, 1986,154(1): 76-83.
  • 10Blum G, Perkhofer S, Haas H, et al. Potential basis for ampho- tericin B resistance in Aspergillus te~Teus[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2008,52(4): 1553-1555.

共引文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部