摘要
目的分析比较药物诱导性自身免疫性肝炎(DI-AIH)、药物性肝损伤(DILI)和自身免疫性肝炎(AIH)患者的临床特征。方法2017年1月~2021年12月我院收治的22例DI-AIH患者、23例DILI患者和23例AIH患者,给予DI-AIH和AIH患者泼尼松或/和硫唑嘌呤联合治疗,给予DILI患者丁二磺酸腺苷蛋氨酸联合异甘草酸镁注射液治疗,直至肝功能指标正常,随访24个月。结果DILI组和DI-AIH组明确应用药物百分比分别为82.6%和100.0%,均显著高于AIH组的17.4%(P<0.05),且均以应用中草药为主;三组常见的临床症状为食欲下降、眼黄、腹泻等,且三组临床症状发生率存在显著性差异(DI-AIH、AIH和DILI组分别为81.8%、52.2%和47.8%,P<0.05);DI-AIH组血清ALT、ALP、GGT和总胆汁酸水平分别为331.2(116.4,512.5)U/L、125.4(91.6,164.8)U/L、202.4(98.8,394.1)U/L和23.7(13.1,69.7)μmol/L,显著高于DILI组【分别为198.6(94.3,497.6)U/L、98.9(67.7,168.9)U/L、101.2(49.6,231.4)U/L和7.1(2.7,29.2)μmol/L,P<0.05】或AIH组【分别为86.7(32.4,186.3)U/L、65.8(54.7,109.8)U/L、71.6(61.4,142.5)U/L和11.5(4.1,35.6)μmol/L,P<0.05】,而AIH组血清球蛋白水平为35.6(28.7,41.4)g/L,显著高于DILI组【28.8(21.2,34.5)g/L,P<0.05】或DI-AIH组【30.5(24.6,42.1)g/L,P<0.05】;三组白细胞计数比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论DILI和DI-AIH的致病药物主要以中草药应用为主,DI-AIH患者存在一些较特殊的临床特征值得关注,表现为血清酶学水平较高,对免疫抑制和护肝治疗有效。
Objective The aim of this study was conducted to compare the clinical features of patients with drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis(DI-AIH),autoimmune hepatitis(AIH)and drug-induced liver injury(DILI).Methods 22 patients with DI-AIH,23 patients with DILI and 23 patients with AIH were encountered in our hospital between January 2017 and December 2021,the patients with AIH and DI-AIH were treated with prednisone and/or azathioprine combination therapy,and those with DILI were dealt with liver-protecting medicines.All patients were followed-up for two years.Results The percentages of definite medicine administered before diagnosis of patients with DILI and DI-AIH were 82.6%and 100.0%,with the alleged Chinese herbal medicine mainly,both significantly higher than 17.4%(P<0.05)in patients with AIH;the incidence of common symptoms,such as anorexia,jaundice and diarrhea in patients with DI-AIH was 81.8%,much higher than 52.2%and 47.8%(P<0.05)in those with AIH or with DILI;serum alanine aminotransaminase,alkaline phosphatase,glutamine transpeptidase and total bile acid levels in patients with DI-AIH were 331.2(116.4,512.5)U/L,125.4(91.6,164.8)U/L,202.4(98.8,394.1)U/L and 23.7(13.1,69.7)μmol/L,all significantly higher than[198.6(94.3,497.6)U/L,98.9(67.7,168.9)U/L,101.2(49.6,231.4)U/L and 7.1(2.7,29.2)μmol/L,respectively,P<0.05]in patients with DILI or[86.7(32.4,186.3)U/L,65.8(54.7,109.8)U/L,71.6(61.4,142.5)U/L and 11.5(4.1,35.6)μmol/L,respectively,P<0.05]in patients with AIH,while serum globulin level in patients with AIH was 35.6(28.7,41.4)g/L,significantly higher than 28.8(21.2,34.5)g/L in patients with DILI(P<0.05)or 30.5(24.6,42.1)g/L in patients with DI-AIH(P<0.05);there were no significant differences as respect to peripheral white blood cell counts among the three groups(P>0.05).Conclusion The main pathogenic medicines in patients with DILI and DI-AIH are Chinese herbal medicine,and the clinical features of patients with DI-AIH are unique,presenting with highly increased serum biochemical parameters and good prognosis,showing response to immunosuppression and liver-protecting therapy.
作者
符馨尹
林小茹
郑秀芬
刘小双
Fu Xinyin;Lin Xiaoru;Zheng Xiufen(Department of Pharmacy,First Affiliated Hospital,Hainan Medical College,Haikou 570102,Hainan Province,China)
出处
《实用肝脏病杂志》
CAS
2023年第4期512-515,共4页
Journal of Practical Hepatology
基金
海南省自然科学基金青年基金项目(编号:819QN368)。