期刊文献+

改良版手术患者隐私保护量表在手术室护士中的验证 被引量:1

Verification on modified surgical patients’privacy protection scale among operating room nurses
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对患者隐私保护量表进行改良,并在手术室护士中检验改良版手术患者隐私保护量表的信度、效度及各条目质量。方法项目研究小组通过对11名专家进行函询与小组讨论最终确定改良版手术患者隐私保护量表。2022年6-7月,采用简单随机抽样选取浙江省某三级甲等医院的288名手术室护士进行改良版手术患者隐私保护量表的信效度检验。结果原版患者隐私保护量表中的8个条目被剔除,2个条目被修订,最终改良版手术患者隐私保护量表含19个条目。改良版手术患者隐私保护量表内容效度指数是0.87;探索性因子分析提取了3个主因子,累计方差的贡献率为80.36%;3个因子平均方差抽取量值分别为0.80、0.76和0.74,3个因子的组合信度分别为0.82、0.78和0.76;Cronbach’sα系数为0.982。验证性因子分析所得结果支持探索性因子分析量表结构,相关拟合指数均达标。结论改良版手术患者隐私保护量表信效度良好,临床上可作为了解手术室护士对患者隐私保护情况的评定工具。 Objective To modify patients’privacy protection scale and test the reliability,validity and quality of each item of modified surgical patients’privacy protection scale among operating room nurses.Methods Research group finally determined the modified surgical patients’privacy protection scale by expert consultation and group disdussion.Totally 288 operating room nurses from a GradeⅢLevel A hospital in Zhejiang Province were chosen by simple random sampling to test the reliability and validity of the modified surgical patients’privacy protection scale from June to July 2022.Results After consultation of 11 experts and group disdussion,8 items were deleted and 2 items were revised in the original edition of scale.The final modified surgical patients’privacy protection scale contained 19 items.The content validity index was 0.87 in modified surgical patients’privacy protection scale.Exploratory factor analysis extracted 3 main factors and the contribution rate of accumulated variance was 80.36%.The average variance extracted of 3 factors were 0.80,0.76 and 0.74.The composite reliability of 3 factors were 0.82,0.78 and 0.76.The Cronbach’sαcoefficient was 0.982.The result of confirmatory factor analysis could support the structure of exploratory factor analysis scale and the related fitting indexes were all standard.Conclusion The modify patients’privacy protection scale has nice reliability and validity,which can be a assessment tool to study the patients’privacy protection status from operating room nurses.
作者 王秋香 王莺 周渝琼 Wang Qiuxiang;Wang Ying;Zhou Yuqiong(Zhejiang Chinese Medical University,Hangzhou Zhejiang 310006,China;The First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine,Hangzhou Zhejiang 310003,China)
出处 《护理与康复》 2023年第7期1-5,共5页 Journal of Nursing and Rehabilitation
基金 浙江省卫生健康科技计划(新技术产品研发项目),编号2022PY052
关键词 手术室 隐私保护 量表 信度 效度 operating room privacy protection scale reliability validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献60

  • 1张传友.试论患者的隐私权[J].中国医院管理,2005,25(5):26-28. 被引量:63
  • 2黄颖,姜柏生.患者隐私权的研究现状与保护进展[J].医学与哲学(A),2007,28(4):26-28. 被引量:26
  • 3温忠麟,刘红云,侯杰泰.(2012).溺节效应和中介效应分析.北京:教育科学出版社.
  • 4Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletln, 107, 238-246.
  • 5Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
  • 6Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: Willey.
  • 7Fan, X., & Sivo, S. A. (2007). Sensitivity of fit indices to model misspecitication and model types. Mulgvmlate Behavioral Research, 42, 509-529.
  • 8Henseler, J., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling. Computational Statistics, 28, 565-580.
  • 9Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424-453.
  • 10Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.

共引文献82

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部