基层腐败治理中公众参与差异性生成机理——基于自我决定理论分析框架

Formation Mechanism about Differences of the Public Participation in Tackling Corruption at the Grass-Roots Level——Based on an Analytical Framework of Self-Determination Theory

基层腐败治理离不开公众参与,解析公众参与差异性现象对提升基层腐败治理绩效具有积极意义。以重庆市的公众参与实践为例,运用自我决定理论分析框架,通过质性研究发现:基于控制性动机、功用性动机和自主性动机分别输出低度、中度和高度参与结果,体现了从众效应、工具理性和价值理性特征;从众效应主导的低度参与属于非理性模式,工具理性和价值理性主导的中、高度参与属于理性模式,有必要有机融合两种理性模式,实现个人利益与公共利益的良性结合。消除公众参与差异性的关键在于腐败治理理念、党风廉政建设和社会廉洁教育须坚持“以人民为中心”,这为充分发挥公众的监督作用提供了相应参考。

Tackling corruption at the grass-roots level can′t be separated from the public participation,and analyzing the differences in public participation has positive significance for improving the performance of grass-roots corruption governance.Taking the practice of the public participation in Chongqing as an example,and using the framework of self-determination theory,through the qualitative research,it is found that the results of low participation,moderate participation and high participation are based on controlled motivation,functional motivation and autonomous motivation,and it embodies the characteristics of conformity effect,instrumental rationality and value rationality.The low participation dominated by the conformity effect can be identified as an irrational pattern,the medium and high participations respectively led by instrumental rationality and value rationality form two rational patterns.It is necessary to organically integrate the two rational models to realize the benign combination of individual interests and public interests.The key to eliminate the differences of the public participation lies in the adherence to″the people-centered″concept for corruption governance,construction of the Party conduct and clean government,and education of social integrity.This provides a reference for giving full play to the role of the public supervision.