期刊文献+

M6型射波刀立体定向放疗系统的验收测试 被引量:2

Acceptance test of M6 CyberKnife stereotactic radiotherapy system
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:对M6型射波刀立体定向放疗系统的各项技术指标进行临床验收测试,评估其安全性及精确性。方法:参考Accuray公司及国内外相关标准与方法,对M6型射波刀的KUKA机器臂、患者定位、目标定位、可变准直器、直线加速器、治疗计划等6个子系统及端到端综合照射精度进行检测与评估。结果:机器人系统所有节点到位偏差平均值≤0.08 mm,最大值≤0.311 mm。患者治疗床系统偏差:前后(x)方向=0.4 mm、左右(y)方向=0.1 mm、上下(z)方向=0 mm、左右旋转(r)方向=0.1°、头脚旋转(p)方向=0°。目标定位系统:A影像中心偏差x=0.23 mm、y=-0.31 mm,B影像中心偏差x=0.28 mm,y=-0.35 mm;目标定位追踪偏差x=0 mm、y=0.1 mm、z=0.1 mm、r=0.1°、p=-0.1°。iris准直器各尺寸重复性最大偏差0.32 mm。直线加速器系统:SAD=800 mm处光射野一致性精度为x=0.23 mm、y=0.35 mm;射束性能指标中剂量稳定性0.06%,剂量输出线性偏差≤0.53%,iris准直器透射率0.09%、fixed准直器透射率0.14%;孔径60 mm fixed准直器,其半影=4.2 mm、对称性=100.8%、平坦度=109.7%;最大剂量深度为15.5 mm,射线质TPR^(20)_(10)等于0.633。治疗计划系统:影像几何精度x=0.071 mm,y=-0.173 mm,z=0.361 mm;计划点剂量精度0.08%;机器跳数手工验算精度0.04%。E2E测试:fixed准直器追踪精度为0.47 mm(颅骨追踪)、0.45 mm(金标追踪)、0.77 mm(脊柱追踪)、0.50 mm(同步呼吸追踪)、0.42 mm(肺追踪),iris准直器相应的追踪精度为0.23、0.69、0.70、0.51、0.73 mm。结论:M6型射波刀作为亚毫米级的立体定向放疗外科设备,各项参数测试结果均优于验收标准,其精确性、可靠性均满足临床要求。 Objective To conduct a clinical acceptance test on M6 CyberKnife stereotactic radiotherapy system for evaluating its safety and accuracy.Methods Referring to the standards and methods of Accuray and relevant domestic and international standards,the 6 subsystems of M6 CyberKnife including KUKA robot,patient positioning,target positioning,variable collimator,linear accelerator and treatment plan were evaluated,and an end-to-end test was carried out to analyze its overall irradiation accuracy.Results The average deviation of all nodes in the robot system was≤0.08 mm,and the maximum was≤0.311 mm.The system deviation of treatment couch was as follow:anterior-posterior(x)=0.4 mm,left-right(y)=0.1 mm,superior-inferior(z)=0 mm,left-to-right rotation(r)=0.1°,superior-to-inferior rotation(p)=0°.In target positioning system,A image center deviations were x=0.23 mm,y=-0.31 mm,and B image center deviations were x=0.28 mm,y=-0.35 mm;the tracking deviations were as follow:x=0 mm,y=0.1 mm,z=0.1 mm,r=0.1°,p=-0.1°.The maximum repeatability deviation of each size of the iris collimator was 0.32 mm.For linear accelerator,the field consistency deviations at SAD=800 mm were x=0.23 mm,y=0.35 mm.The evaluation on beam performance showed that the dose stability,dose output linear deviation,iris transmittance and fixed transmittance were 0.06%,≤0.53%,0.09%and 0.14%,respectively.The penumbral,symmetry and flatness of 60 mm fixed collimator were 4.2 mm,100.8%and 109.7%,respectively.The maximum dose depth was 15.5 mm,and the TPR^(20)_(10) was 0.633.For treatment planning system,the image geometric deviations were x=0.071 mm,y=-0.173 mm,z=0.361 mm;planning point dose deviation was 0.08%;and the deviation of monitor units in manual calculation was 0.04%.End-to-end test revealed that the accuracies of fixed collimator were 0.47 mm for 6D skull tracking,0.45 mm for Fiducial tracking,0.77 mm for Xsight spine tracking,0.50 mm for synchrony respiratory tracking,-0.42 mm for lung tracking,and that the tracking accuracies of iris collimator were 0.23,0.69,0.70,0.51 and 0.73 mm,respectively.Conclusion M6 CyberKnife as a sub-millimeter-level stereotactic radiosurgery equipment satisfy the acceptance criteria,and its accuracy and reliability meet the clinical requirements.
作者 苏坤普 周德力 李林山 司梦远 肖姚 刘岩海 马俊刚 李梦侠 陈川 SU Kunpu;ZHOU Deli;LI Linshan;SI Mengyuan;XIAO Yao;LIU Yanhai;MA Jungang;LI Mengxia;CHEN Chuan(Department of Oncology,Army Medical Center of PLA,Chongqing 400042,China)
出处 《中国医学物理学杂志》 CSCD 2023年第7期814-821,共8页 Chinese Journal of Medical Physics
基金 重庆市科卫联合医学科研项目重点项目(2022ZDXM027)。
关键词 M6型射波刀 剂量特性 端到端测试 验收测试 M6 CyberKnife dose characteristics end-to-end test acceptance test
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献11

  • 1IAEA. Absorbed Dose Determination in Photon and Electron Beams: An International Code of Practice, Technical Reports Series No. 277 (2nd edn in 1997)[M]. Vienna: IAEA, 1987.
  • 2AAPM TG-51. Clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams[J]. Med Phys, 1999, 26(9): 1847-1871.
  • 3IAEA. Absorbed Dose Determination in External Beam Radiotherapy: An International Code of Practice for Dosimetry based on Standards of Absorbed Dose to Water, Technical Report Series No.398[M]. Vienna: IAEA, 2000.
  • 4AAPM TG-21. A protocol for the determination of absorbed dose from high-energy photon and electron beams [J]. Med Phys, 1983, 10 (6): 741-771.
  • 5Burns JE. Conversion of PDD for photon beams from one SSD to another and calculation of TAR, TMR and TPR. In: Central axis depth dose data for use in radiotherapy: 1996, BJR Supplement 25[M]. London: British Institute of Radiology. 1996: 153-157.
  • 6Accuray Inc. Physice essentials guide [M]. Sunnyvale: Accuray Incorporated. 2006: 2-62/2-81.
  • 7Huq MS, Andreo P, Song H. Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams. Phys Med Biol. 2001 Nov;46 (11):2985-3006.
  • 8Lopez Medina A, Teijeiro A, Salvador F, et al. Comparison between TG-51 and TRS-398: electron contamination effect on photon beam-quality specification. Phys Med Biol. 2004 Jan 7;49(1):17-32.
  • 9Araki F, Kubo HD. Comparison of high-energy photon and electron dosimetry for various dosimetry protocols. Med Phys. 2002 May;29 (5):857--68.
  • 10李兵,罗立民,沈君姝.水模体吸收剂量校准因子的比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2009,26(4):1270-1272. 被引量:2

共引文献2

同被引文献17

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部