期刊文献+

个人信息保护公益诉讼的程序构造--从损害救济模式向风险防控模式的转向 被引量:5

Procedural Structure of Public Interest Litigation for Personal Information Protection--The Shift from the Damage Relief Model to the Risk Prevention and Control Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 由于制度设计的先天性局限与司法运行的实践理性,当前个人信息保护公益诉讼的程序构造采取事后损害救济模式。个人信息保护公益诉讼对损害救济模式泛化性适用的根源在于:案件线索发现的“刑事化”、公益诉讼运行的谦抑性、侵权责任认定的依赖性。然而,损害救济模式不足以实现公益的全面、全过程保护,个人信息保护公益诉讼的程序构造遭遇理论正当性与实践危机性的拷问。以风险预防原则为理论分析工具,可以发现损害救济模式未遵循《个人信息保护法》的制度理念,亦未审酌个人信息公共利益损害不可逆转的特征。为有效预防个人信息风险,及时制止个人信息公共利益损害,有必要适时转换公益诉讼模式,对个人信息保护公益诉讼进行风险化改造(风险防控模式),以适应该制度体系化发展的需求。 Due to the inherent limitations of the system design and the practical rationality of judicial operation,the current procedural structure of personal information public interest litigation adopts an ex post damage relief model.The root cause of the generalized application of the damage relief model in personal information public interest litigation is the“criminalization”of case discovery,the modesty of public interest litigation,and the dependence on the determination of tort liability.However,the damage relief model is not sufficient to achieve the comprehensive and full process protection of public interest,and the single structure of personal information public interest litigation procedure is under the question of theoretical justification and practical crisis.Using the risk prevention principle as a theoretical analysis tool,we can find that the damage relief model does not follow the institutional concept of the Personal Information Protection Law and does not consider the irreversible nature of damage to the public interest of personal information.In order to effectively prevent information risks and control the damage to the public interest of personal information,it is necessary to change the public interest litigation model and“risk-based transformation”(risk prevention and control model)of personal information public interest litigation in order to properly adapt to the needs of the systematic development of the personal information public interest litigation system.
作者 苏和生 SU He-sheng(Fudan University)
机构地区 复旦大学法学院
出处 《华中科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 北大核心 2023年第4期98-110,共13页 Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目“民事司法程序现代化问题研究”(21ZD206) 国家社会科学基金重点项目“推进法治国家、法治政府、法治社会一体化建设的民事司法保障制度研究”(21AZD090) 重庆市社会科学规划项目“大数据时代个人信息保护检察公益诉讼研究”(2022NDYB35)。
关键词 个人信息 公益诉讼 损害救济 风险预防原则 预防性诉讼 personal information public interest litigation damage remedies precautionary principle of risk preventive litigation
  • 相关文献

参考文献36

二级参考文献467

共引文献2262

同被引文献174

引证文献5

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部