摘要
检察机关在审查起诉阶段开展合规考察的时间有限,通过“二退三延”“取保候审”模式仍无法从根本上解决这一问题。部分检察机关通过申请介入、主动介入、协商介入三种不同路径,将合规考察前移至侦查阶段,兼顾了刑事合规实体与程序上的从宽效果,具有相应的规范依据支撑。未来检察机关可以考虑采取以“协商为主、申请和主动为辅”的介入方式,结合社会影响、案件情况,确定检察介入侦查的案件范围,在案件基本情形清晰、证据固定后主导合规考察。
Procuratorates have limited time to inspect compliance while doing review works at the prosecution stage,and this problem cannot be fundamentally solved by means of“two retreats and three extensions”and“bail pending trial”.Some procuratorates have moved compliance inspection forward to the investigation stage through applying-for intervention,active intervention and consultation intervention.Such behaviors meet leniency need for criminal compliance in both substantive and procedural terms,which is supported by corresponding normative basis.In the future,procuratorates may consider adopting the approach which is mainly based on consultation,supplemented by applying-for and active interventions,to decide the investigation intervention scope by considering social impact and case itself,so as to lead the compliance inspection based on clear case facts and fixed evidence.
作者
李冲
LI Chong(Shandong University,Qingdao Shandong 266000,China)
出处
《山西警察学院学报》
2023年第4期63-69,共7页
Journal of Shanxi Police College
基金
中国博士后科学基金第72批面上资助“少捕慎诉慎押政策背景下羁押听证制度研究”(2022M721918)
2022年度山东省高等学校“青创团队计划”团队“(刑事合规立法问题创新团队)刑事合规制度的立法方案研究”(2022RW004)。
关键词
刑事合规
合规考察期
侦查阶段
检察机关
criminal compliance
compliance inspection period
investigation stage
procuratorate