中国哲学史学溯源:先秦学术史论著的学术立场

Historiography of Chinese Philosophy Traceability:the Academic Standpoints of the Academic History Essays of the Pre-Qin Dynasty

《庄子·天下》《荀子·非十二子》《韩非子·显学》是中国最早的哲学史学史论著,呈现出不同的学术立场。《荀子·非十二子》的学术立场是儒家的,《韩非子·显学》的学术立场是法家的,《庄子·天下》的学术立场是儒道兼综的。三者不同学术立场的选择主要基于作者自觉的学派归属意识。《韩非子·显学》和《庄子·天下》对墨家和名家的批评所体现的是儒家哲学的情感意识和实用思维。至于《荀子·非十二子》的“同门相煎”主要来自于儒家内部的观念分歧。

ZhuangZi·The World,Xun Zi·Fei Shi Er Zi,and Han Feizi·Famous Theory of Thought are the earliest works on the history of philosophical history in China,which present different academic positions.The academic position of Xun Zi·Fei Shi Er Zi is Confucian,the academic position of Han Feizi·Famous Theory of Thought belongs to Legalists,and the academic position of ZhuangZi·The World is a combination of Confucianism and Taoism.The choice of their different academic positions is mainly based on the authors’consciousness of belonging to the school.Their common aim at the Mohists school and the Logicians reflects the emotional consciousness and practical thinking of the Confucian philosophy.As for“the same school torment each other”of Xun Zi·Fei Shi Er Zi mainly comes from the differences of ideas within Confucianism.