期刊文献+

食品中重金属的健康风险评估研究进展 被引量:1

Research progress on health risk assessment of heavy metals in food
下载PDF
导出
摘要 重金属作为受关注的污染物,其毒性具有刺激性、靶器官毒性和致癌性等特点。食品中的重金属是进入人体的主要途径之一。因此,使用精确的方法评估食品对人体的健康风险具有重要意义。重金属的人体生物可利用性可以较为贴近人体重金属暴露的实际情况,通过模拟体外生物可利用性实验模型是现有获取重金属人体生物可利用性数据的通用方法。利用生物可利用性数据评估人体重金属暴露的健康风险相比直接利用食品重金属含量更为准确。本文综述了食品的人体生物可利用性实验方法及现行的重金属健康风险评估方法,分析对比了各种方法的优点和局限性,为科研人员确定不同污染物在食品中的生物可利用性提供思路和方向,以加强食品安全评估和人体重金属暴露评估的准确性。 Heavy metals are global pollutants with irritating toxicity,target organ toxicity and carcinogenicity.Ingestion through food is an essential pathway for heavy metals to enter into the human body.Thus,an accurate assessment of the health risks posed by food ingestion is necessary for heavy metals.Simulating the in vitro bioaccessibility experimental methods are common approaches to obtaining human bioaccessibility data for heavy metals,which is more reliable than directly utilizing the concentration of heavy metals.This paper reviewed highlights the experimental methods for assessing the human bioaccessibility of food and existing health risk assessment methods for heavy metals,discussed and compared the advantages and limitations of current methods,providing researchers with ideas and directions to determine the bioaccessibility of different pollutants in food,and improving the accuracy of food safety assessment and heavy metal exposure assessment for human health.
作者 林新校 吴泽 LIN Xin-Xiao;WU Ze(College of Ecological and Environmental Engineering,Guizhou Minzu University,Guiyang 550025,China)
出处 《食品安全质量检测学报》 CAS 北大核心 2023年第12期225-233,共9页 Journal of Food Safety and Quality
基金 贵州民族大学校级自然科学基金项目(GZMUZK[2021]YB14)。
关键词 重金属 慢性毒性 生物可利用性 健康风险评估 heavy metal chronic toxicity bioaccessibility health risk assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献23

  • 1陈鸿汉,谌宏伟,何江涛,刘菲,沈照理,韩冰,孙静.污染场地健康风险评价的理论和方法[J].地学前缘,2006,13(1):216-223. 被引量:156
  • 2杨胜利,董子明,裴留成,丁兰平,张慧芳,宋爱云,宫亚欧,刘桂亭,薛乐勋.河南林县居民粮食中互隔交链孢霉及其毒素污染和人群暴露状况研究[J].癌变.畸变.突变,2007,19(1):44-46. 被引量:16
  • 3Colin C F. Assessing risk from contaminated sites: policy and practice in 16 European countries [ J ]. Land Con- tamination and Reclamation, 1999, 7 (2) : 33-54.
  • 4USEPA. Risk assessment guidance for superfund: human health evaluation manual ( part C, risk evaluation of re- medial alternatives), EPA/540 /R-92 /003 [ EB/OL]. http: //www. epa. gov, 1991.
  • 5Fryer M, Collinsb C D, Ferrierc H, et al. Human expo- sure modeling for chemical risk assessment: a review of current approaches and research and policy implications [ J]. Environment Science and Policy, 2006 (9) : 261- 274.
  • 6UK Environment Agency. Fact sheet for the RBCA tool kit for chemical release [EB/OL]. http: //www. envi- ronment-agency, gov. uk, 2007.
  • 7Chang S H, Kuo C Y, Wang J W, et al. Comparison of RBCA and CalTOX for setting risk-based cleanup levels based on inhalation exposure [ J ]. Chernosphere, 2004, 56: 359-367.
  • 8Office of Solid Waste, US Environmental Protection A- gency. Technical background fossil fuel combustion wastes: ground-water pathway human health risk assess- ment [ EB/OL ]. http: //www. epa. gov. /epao- swer/other/fossil/ffc2 395. pdf. 2007.
  • 9Department for Environment. Food and rural affairs and the environment agency. Assessment of risks to human health from land contamination: an overview of the de- velopment of soil guideline values and related research [EB/OL]. http: //www. environment-agency, gov. uk/commondata/acrobat/clr7675334, pdf. 2007.
  • 10齐硕,张蕾,张耀为.地下水土石油类污染修复技术途径[J].世界地质,2008,27(3):319-322. 被引量:5

共引文献10

同被引文献19

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部