期刊文献+

不同主导模式下工业共生链的定价决策研究

A study of decision making in industrial symbiosis chain dominated by different rights
下载PDF
导出
摘要 工业共生链管理是提高不同链之间经济效益与环境可持续发展的有效手段。为研究不同主导模式下工业共生链中各企业的定价问题,建立一个由废弃物供应商和产品制造商组成的两级工业共生链模型,采用博弈论分析方法求得不同主导模式下废弃物供应商和产品制造商的最优定价和利润模型,在此基础上进一步分析了共生程度、废弃物利用率、单位利润值对工业共生链中各方收益的影响。研究发现:不同权利结构会导致各利益主体的最优价格和最大利润不同,当制造商处于主导地位时工业共生链总收益高于供应商主导;随着共生程度和废弃物利用率的增加,工业共生链中制造商和供应商均可获得更多的利润。最后,通过算例分析,验证了结论的有效性。 Industrial symbiosis chain management is an effective means of improving economic efficiency and environmental sustainability between different chains.A two-level industrial symbiosis chain model consisting of a single supplier and a single manufacturer was developed.The Stackelberg game was used to analyze the optimal pricing and profit model for each participant under different rights dominant models of suppliers and manufacturers.The impact of the degree of symbiosis,waste utilization and unit profit value on the revenue of the industrial symbiosis chain was also analyzed.Results show that different rights dominance leads to different optimal prices and maximum profits for each player.Suppliers and manufacturers are in the lead in price and revenue decisions regardless of who dominates.The total revenue of the industrial symbiosis chain is higher when the manufacturer is dominant than when the supplier is dominant.As the degree of symbiosis and waste utilization increases,the symbiotic firms can earn more profits.The validity of the conclusions is finally verified by the analysis of arithmetic examples.
作者 施可可 李芳 王东阳 周兆思 SHI Keke;LI Fang;WANG Dongyang;ZHOU Zhaosi(Business School,University of Shanghai for Science and Technology,Shanghai 200093,China)
出处 《上海理工大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2023年第3期281-290,共10页 Journal of University of Shanghai For Science and Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71840003) 上海市软科学研究重点项目(19692104000)。
关键词 工业共生链 共生程度 废弃物可利用率 STACKELBERG博弈 industrial symbiotic chains symbiosis degree waste availability Stackelberg games
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献56

  • 1徐大伟,王子彦,丁旭.基于演化理论的工业生态化制度变迁分析[J].管理评论,2005,17(8):53-57. 被引量:5
  • 2Shishir Kumar Behera,Jung-Hoon Kim,Sang-Yoon Lee,Sangwon Suh,Hung-Suck Park.Evolution of ‘designed’ industrial symbiosis networks in the Ulsan Eco-industrial Park: ‘research and development into business’ as the enabling framework[J].Journal of Cleaner Production.2012
  • 3Shuiqing Yang,Yaobin Lu,Ling Zhao,Sumeet Gupta.Empirical investigation of customers’ channel extension behavior: Perceptions shift toward the online channel[J]. Computers in Human Behavior . 2011 (5)
  • 4Sanjukta Pookulangara,Jana Hawley,Ge Xiao.Explaining consumers’ channel-switching behavior using the theory of planned behavior[J]. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services . 2011 (4)
  • 5Jye-Chyi Lu,Yu-Chung Tsao,Chayakrit Charoensiriwath.Competition under manufacturer service and retail price[J]. Economic Modelling . 2011 (3)
  • 6Eman Almehdawe,Benny Mantin.Vendor managed inventory with a capacitated manufacturer and multiple retailers: Retailer versus manufacturer leadership[J]. International Journal of Production Economics . 2010 (1)
  • 7Qiying Hu,Yihua Wei,Yusen Xia.Revenue management for a supply chain with two streams of customers[J]. European Journal of Operational Research . 2009 (2)
  • 8Wei-yu Kevin Chiang.Product availability in competitive and cooperative dual-channel distribution with stock-out based substitution[J]. European Journal of Operational Research . 2008 (1)
  • 9Arun Sharma,Anuj Mehrotra.Choosing an optimal channel mix in multichannel environments[J]. Industrial Marketing Management . 2006 (1)
  • 10Aussadavut Dumrongsiri,Ming Fan,Apurva Jain,Kamran Moinzadeh.A supply chain model with direct and retail channels[J]. European Journal of Operational Research . 2006 (3)

共引文献103

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部