摘要
《民法典》规定了生态环境侵权的惩罚性赔偿制度,但该制度是否适用于生态环境损害存在争议。从必要性角度看,目前的生态环境损害赔偿与行政处罚相结合的方式与生态环境损害惩罚性赔偿存在功能重叠;从可行性角度看,生态环境损害行为的道德可责性低,生态环境损害行为的“故意”难以认定。为避免制度重叠和适用的操作难题,生态环境损害不应适用惩罚性赔偿。
The punitive compensation system for environmental torts had been provided in the Civil Code,but it was controversial whether this system could apply to ecological damage.From the perspective of necessity,the function of combining ecological damage compensation and administrative punishment overlapped with the function of punitive compensation for ecological damage.From the perspective of feasibility,the ecological damage behavior had low moral accountability,and it was hard to distinguish the subjective intention of ecological damage behavior.In order to avoid overlapping systems and operational problems,the punitive compensation system should not be applied to ecological damage.
作者
刘倩
LIU Qian(Chinese Academy of Environmental Planning,Beijing 100012)
出处
《环境污染与防治》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2023年第7期1032-1035,共4页
Environmental Pollution & Control
基金
国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.42277491)。
关键词
生态环境损害
惩罚性赔偿
行政处罚
道德可责性
故意
ecological damage
punitive compensation
administrative punishment
moral accountability
intention
