ChatGPT介入意识形态安全治理的逻辑、风险及应对

The Logic,Risks and Responses of ChatGPT’s Intervention in Ideological Security Governance

拥有跨模态深度学习能力的ChatGPT具备了全方位介入意识形态安全治理的超级能力,从文本生成与话语传播双重维度重构了当前意识形态安全治理的基本格局。主要表现为ChatGPT以惊人的算力、算法、算策以及聚合语料知识等功能叠加重置了意识形态文本生成的基础场景,打破了意识形态话语传播的传统模式,冲击了主流意识形态治理的底层逻辑。由此滋生不可忽视的意识形态安全治理风险:物化现象对公意诉求的侵占、政治背景与技术规律的关联、伦理道德和公共秩序的失位不断稀释主流意识形态凝聚力、削弱主流意识形态认同、加剧意识形态渗透和错误思潮传播、威胁主流意识形态权威。在此背景下意识形态安全治理需由被动适应ChatGPT强势介入转向主动识别智控技术,积极解码ChatGPT介入逻辑的底层算法技术,以价值理性为引导推动完善公共向善技术体系建设,建立ChatGPT推广应用与意识形态安全治理的同向发展机制,进而实现化“智能”为“治理”的良性进阶。

ChatGPT with cross-modal deep learning capability has the super ability to intervene in ideological security governance in all aspects,and reconstructs the basic pattern of current ideological security governance from the dual dimensions of text generation and discourse dissemination.The main manifestation is that ChatGPT has reset the basic scenario of ideological text generation with its amazing arithmetic power,algorithms,calculation strategies and aggregated corpus knowledge,breaking the traditional mode of ideological discourse dissemination and impacting the underlying logic of mainstream ideological governance.As a result,the risks of ideological security governance cannot be ignored:the encroachment of materialization on public demands,the connection between political background and technological laws,and the dislocation of ethics and public order continue to dilute mainstream ideological cohesion,weaken mainstream ideological identity,intensify ideological infiltration and the spread of wrong ideas,and threaten mainstream ideological authority.In this context,ideological security governance needs to shift from passive adaptation to strong ChatGPT intervention to active identification of intelligent control technology,actively decode the underlying algorithm technology of ChatGPT intervention logic,promote the construction of a perfect public good technology system guided by value rationality,and establish a mechanism for the same direction of development of ChatGPT promotion and application and ideological security governance,so as to achieve the benign progression of“intelligence”to“governance”.