期刊文献+

浅析公安机关侦查人员较少出庭作证的原因及对策

Reasons and Countermeasures for Fewer Detectives of Public Security Organs to Testify in Court
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在以审判为中心的刑事诉讼制度改革大背景下,公安机关的侦查活动已然转变为服务于审判的诉讼准备活动。司法实践中,公安机关侦查人员较少出庭作证,在一定程度上显现出对相关法律规则的规避。究其原因,主要存在庭审未完全实质化、运行模式掣肘、公安机关的被动应付、侦查人员的抵触情绪和现实制约等因素。通过树立现代文明司法理念、公检法的有效衔接运行、公安机关的全力保障和侦查人员专业有效参与,逐步完善和强化侦查人员出庭作证,保证庭审对证据的认定和裁判公正,进而促进庭审的实质化。 Under the background of the reform of criminal procedure system with trial as the center,the detective activities of the public security organs have been transformed into litigation preparatory activities for trial.In judicial practice,detectives of public security organs rarely testify in court,which shows their evasion of relevant legal rules to a certain extent.The main reasons for this are the absence of fully substantive trial,the constraints of the operation mode,the passive response of the public security organs,the resistance of the detectives and the practical constraints.Through the establishment of a modern civilized concept of justice,the effective connection and operation of the public security organs,the prosecution and the court,the full support of the public security organs,and the professional and effective participation of the detectives,we can gradually improve and strengthen the testimony of the detectives in court to ensure the justice of the evidence identification and the trial,and further promote the substantive trial.
作者 杨金城 张士栋 Yang Jincheng;Zhang Shidong(Tibet University,Lhasa 850000;The People’s Court of Baiyin District of Baiyin,Baiyin 730900)
出处 《西部学刊》 2023年第14期96-99,共4页 Journal of Western
关键词 侦查人员 出庭作证 庭审实质化 审判中心 detectives testify in court substantive trial trial center
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献18

共引文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部