摘要
脉冲电场消融(pulsed field ablation,PFA)以其非热、消融边界清晰等优势成为肿瘤和组织消融的关注重点.然而,组织生物物理特性和脉冲参数的多样性导致PFA效果难以预测.本研究考虑PFA消融阈值和两个常用电导率模型参数的不确定性,评估其对消融深度的影响.从模型复杂度、参数敏感度分布、模型鲁棒性给出了模型选择的指标.结果表明单因素决定的模型具有更强的鲁棒性.消融阈值和组织初始电导率依次是影响消融深度评估的两个最敏感参数.该策略可用于多种数学物理和仿真模型,以增强模型可信度和简化模型.
Pulsed field ablation(PFA) is a new type of physical energy source in the fields of tumor and atrial fibrillation ablation,which is based on irreversible electroporation with non-thermal,clear ablation boundaries,selective killing,and rapid advantages.The PFA triggers off the changes in the electrical conductivity of ablation zone,which can be described by a step function and used to predict the ablation zone.However,current research does not compare the advantages and disadvantages of different conductivity models,nor does it consider the effects of model parameter change caused by individual differences and errors on the efficacy of PFA.This work is devoted to comparing two commonly used conductivity models(Heaviside model and Gompertz model),and quantifying the influence of model input uncertainty on model output and PFA ablation zone.In this work,we carry out uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis to quantify the influence of model parameter uncertainty on model output,clarify the parameter sensitivity distribution,and provide model selection criteria from the perspectives of model complexity,parameter sensitivity distribution,and model robustness.Combined with finite element simulation,the study quantifies the effects of uncertainty in the most sensitive parameters of the conductivity model and ablation threshold on the PFA ablation zone.The results show that different conductivity models exhibit different robustness under the same proportion of variation in parameters.The Heaviside model,which is determined by a single factor,has strong robustness.The uncertainty output of the Gompertz model is jointly determined by multiple sensitivity parameters,making it susceptible to various conditions.The ablation threshold and pre-treatment tissue conductivity are the two most sensitive parameters affecting the assessment of ablation depth.Changes in the ablation threshold result in a Gaussian distribution of ablation depth.The greater the change in pre-treatment tissue conductivity,the greater the change in ablation depth is,which,however,follows a nonlinear proportional relationship.This approach can improve the accuracy and reliability of PFA ablation prediction,and provide a visual and global way to show the influence of input uncertainties on model output and parameter sensitivity ranking,thus effectively improving the accuracy of model prediction,reducing computational costs,and optimizing the selection of candidate models.This strategy can be applied to a variety of mathematical physics and simulation models to enhance model credibility and simplify the models.
作者
庄杰
韩瑞
季振宇
石富坤
Zhuang Jie;Han Rui;Ji Zhen-Yu;Shi Fu-Kun(Division of Life Sciences and Medicine,School of Biomedical Engineering(Suzhou),University of Science and Technology of China,Suzhou 215000,China;Suzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Suzhou 215163,China;Faculty of Biomedical Engineering,Air Force Military Medical University,Xi’an 710032,China;Jinan Guoke Medical Technology Development Co.,Ltd,Jinan 250101,China)
出处
《物理学报》
SCIE
EI
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2023年第14期236-243,共8页
Acta Physica Sinica
基金
苏州市基础研究试点项目(批准号:SJC2021025)
山东省自然科学基金(批准号:ZR2022QE168)
科技部重点研发计划(批准号:2019YFC0119102)资助的课题。
关键词
电导率模型
参数敏感度
电穿孔
脉冲电场消融
conductivity model
sensitivity analysis
electroporation
pulsed field ablation