摘要
马克思以资本与劳动的辩证关系批判生息资本在生产中的角色。在资本主义生产方式下,生息资本与生产的关系出现错位。生息资本表现出利息方式的神秘化,进而使其走向资本本质的异化。同时,生息资本在自我增殖中使生产形式化,并造成经济危机。信用作为生息资本的一种表现形式,虽可弥合资本流通的间隙,但也打破了生产的界限。马克思统一商品与资本两个概念框架,让生息资本回归到生产领域。生息资本影响资本流通过程,也就是影响生产过程,它本应从属于生产资本。资本的流动性以资本与劳动的结合为基础。劳动是形式和内容的同一,与资本结合为一个整体。资本的增殖遍布于整个生产过程。
Marx criticized the role of interest-bearing capital in production by examining the dialectical relationship between capital and labor.Under the capitalist mode of production,there is a dislocation between interest-bearing capital and production.Interest-bearing capital exhibits a mystification in the form of interest,leading to its alienation from the essence of capital.Meanwhile,interest-bearing capital,in its self-expansion,formalizes the process of production and contributes to economic crises.Credit,as a manifestation of interest-bearing capital,can bridge the gaps in capital circulation but also disrupts the boundaries of production.Marx unified the two conceptual frameworks of commodity and capital,bringing interest-bearing capital back to the realm of production.Interest-bearing capital affects the process of capital circulation,which in turn influences the process of production.It should be subordinate to productive capital.The liquidity of capital is based on the combination of capital and labor.Labor is the unity of form and content,combined with capital as a whole.The accumulation of capital permeates the entire process of production.
作者
刘华军
LIU Huajun(School of Marxism,Guizhou University)
出处
《南京林业大学学报(人文社会科学版)》
2023年第3期110-119,共10页
Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
马克思
劳动
辩证法
生息资本
Marx
labor
dialectics
interest-bearing capital