摘要
在全球经济下行与主流经济学理论危机的双重背景下,基于库恩范式的视角,对马克思经济学范式与凯恩斯经济学范式的经济周期理论进行深入比较研究发现:两种范式对经济周期的分析在方法论特征、理论基础、经济危机爆发的根源和实质、危机治理政策以及理论预设目标等方面,存在着实质性差别。但是,两种范式对经济周期的分析在宏观总量方法、经济危机爆发的诱因以及经济复苏的基础等方面都有共同触点。为此,要消弭经济危机的影响,推动经济高质量发展,仍需要以马克思经济周期理论为指导,同时有甄别地借鉴凯恩斯经济周期理论。
Under the dual background of global economic downturn and the crisis of mainstream economic theories,based on the perspective of Kuhn's "paradigm",this paper conducts an in-depth comparative study on the economic cycle theory of Marx's economic paradigm and Keynesian economic paradigm.The findings are as follows:There are substantial differences between the two paradigms in the analysis of business cycle in the aspects of methodology characteristics,theoretical basis,the source and essence of the outbreak of economic crisis,crisis management policies and theoretical presuppositions.However,the two paradigms have common touch points in the macro aggregate method,the causes of the outbreak of economic crisis and the basis of economic recovery.Therefore,in order to eliminate the impact of the economic crisis and promote high-quality economic development,it is still necessary to take Marx's business cycle theory as a guidance,and selectively learn from Keynesian business cycle theory.
作者
邓春玲
郭志娟
Deng Chunling;Guo Zhijuan(School of Economics and Management,Dalian University of Science&Technology,Dalian Liaoning 116052,China;Department of Economics,Dongbei University of Finance&Economics,Dalian Liaoning 116025,China)
出处
《河北经贸大学学报》
北大核心
2023年第4期1-12,共12页
Journal of Hebei University of Economics and Business
基金
国家社会科学基金一般项目“共同富裕与人的自由全面发展统一性研究”(22BKS175)。