期刊文献+

长期护理保险社商合作实践:青岛与海淀的比较 被引量:1

The practice of social insurance and commercial insurance cooperation in long-term care insurance:A comparison between Qingdao and Haidian practices
原文传递
导出
摘要 长期护理保险社商合作是应对老年失能人群护理难题的有益尝试,青岛市和北京市海淀区等城市纷纷开展试点探索。然而,两者的实践也存在合作范围狭窄、有效监管缺失和合作稳定性不足等问题。基于此,文章着眼于合理把握合作范围、科学布局内外监管以及建立长效合作机制等方面,探讨优化路径。 The social insurance and commercial insurance cooperation in long-term care insurance is a useful attempt to deal with the nursing problems of elderly disabled people,which has been piloted in Qingdao City and Haidian District of Beijing.However,there are still some problems in their practices,such as the narrow scope of cooperation,lack of effective supervision and insufficient cooperation stability.Based on this,this paper explored the optimized path from the aspects of the rational handling of the scope of cooperation,scientific layout of internal and external supervision and the establishment of long-term cooperative mechanism.
作者 肖艳林 陈肖彬 张燕 吴素雄 XIAO Yanlin;CHEN Xiaobin;ZHANG Yan;WU Suxiong(School of Public Health and Management,Wenzhou Medical University,Wenzhou,Zhejiang 325035,China)
出处 《中国农村卫生事业管理》 2023年第6期414-418,共5页 Chinese Rural Health Service Administration
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(17AZZ011)。
关键词 长期护理保险 社商合作 青岛模式 海淀模式 优化路径 内外监管 运行机制 Long-term care insurance Social insurance and commercial insurance cooperation Qingdao-mode Haidian mode Optimized path Internal and external supervision Operation mechanism
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

二级参考文献96

共引文献73

同被引文献3

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部