期刊文献+

基于真实世界的内镜下金属钛夹联合艾普拉唑治疗非静脉曲张性上消化道出血的临床研究 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的基于真实世界数据,通过倾向性评分法验证内镜下金属钛夹联合艾普拉唑在非静脉曲张性上消化道出血患者中的实际止血有效性和安全性。方法选取非静脉曲张性上消化道出血患者200例,根据治疗方案将患者分为A组(内镜下金属钛夹+奥美拉唑)和B组(内镜下金属钛夹+艾普拉唑),各100例。采用倾向性评分控制混杂因素后,对比两组的止血有效率、再出血率、肠鸣音恢复正常时间、住院时间及不良反应发生率。结果按照倾向性评分值及1∶1匹配原则进行配对,成功配对59对。A组和B组止血有效率分别为77.97%(46/59)、91.53%(54/59),B组显著高于A组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。B组肠鸣音恢复正常时间及住院时间较A组短(均P<0.05)。两组再出血率及不良反应发生率差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论内镜下金属钛夹联合艾普拉唑治疗非静脉曲张性上消化道出血效果显著,能提高止血有效率,降低再出血率,且不良反应较少。
出处 《微创医学》 2023年第3期337-339,347,共4页 Journal of Minimally Invasive Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献141

  • 1Yong-meiHU,Jian-mingXU3,QiaoMEI,Xin-huaXU,Shu-yunXU.Pharmacodynamic effects and kinetic disposition of rabeprazole in relation to CYP2C19 genotype in healthy Chinese subjects[J].Acta Pharmacologica Sinica,2005,26(3):384-388. 被引量:8
  • 2LauJY, SungJ, HillC, et al. Systematic review of the epidemiology of complicated peptic ulcer disease: incidence, recurrence, risk factors and mortality[J]. Digestion, 2011,84(2):102–113. DOI: 10.1159/000323958.
  • 3RockeyDC. Occult and obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: causes and clinical management[J]. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2010,7(5):265–279. DOI: 10.1038/nrgastro.2010.42.
  • 4SrygleyFD, GerardoCJ, TranT, et al. Does this patient have a severe upper gastrointestinal bleed?[J]. JAMA, 2012,307(10):1072–1079. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2012.253.
  • 5BaiY, DuYQ, WangD, et al. Peptic ulcer bleeding in China: a multicenter endoscopic survey of 1006 patients[J]. J Dig Dis, 2014,15(1):5–11. DOI: 10.1111/1751–2980.12104.
  • 6RockallTA, LoganRF, DevlinHB, et al. Risk assessment after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage[J]. Gut, 1996,38(3):316–321.
  • 7BlatchfordO, MurrayWR, BlatchfordM. A risk score to predict need for treatment for upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage[J]. Lancet, 2000,356(9238):1318–1321.
  • 8StanleyAJ, DaltonHR, BlatchfordO, et al. Multicentre comparison of the Glasgow Blatchford and Rockall Scores in the prediction of clinical end-points after upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage[J]. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2011,34(4):470–475. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365–2036.2011.04747.x.
  • 9SaltzmanJR, TabakYP, HyettBH, et al. A simple risk score accurately predicts in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and cost in acute upper GI bleeding[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2011,74(6):1215–1224. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.06.024.
  • 10YakaE, Y?lmazS, DogˇanN?,et al. Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department[J]. Acad Emerg Med, 2015,22(1):22–30. DOI: 10.1111/acem.12554.

共引文献232

同被引文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部