摘要
清初历任河南汝宁与江南扬州两地知府的金镇,先后主持修纂康熙元年《汝宁府志》与康熙十四年《扬州府志》。清初地方官修志大多来自朝廷功令的要求,然而作为循吏的金镇受其个人经历、文学交游、地域想象、自我形塑等因素影响,前后两部志书的编纂却采取了不同的修志策略,并在志书自序中透露出十分显豁的“非功令性”,即官方行为中的私人趣向。金镇的个案还为易代之后文坛整合提供了一个内涵丰富的侧面,像他这样以文章自命的地方官还有许多,记忆的磨损将他们的文人面相汰洗殆尽。通过考察由地方官深度介入的方志修纂,庶几有助于重建这些被忽略的制度性流动者的文学世界。
Jin Zhen successively held the office of Fu Prefect in Runing of Henan and Yangzhou of Jiangnan during the early Qing Dynasty,and took charge of the compilation of Runing Fu Records of the first year of the Reign of Kangxi,and Yangzhou Fu Records of the 14th year of the Reign of Kangxi.Local records compilation sponsored by local officials during the early Qing Dynasty mostly followed the requirement of regulations or orders from the Imperial Court.Yet as an order-abiding official,under the influences of factors such as his personal experiences,literary connections,regional imaginations,and self-image formulation,Jin Zhen took different local records compilation strategies in the compilation of these two sets of local records.Moreover,he revealed obvious"features of non-utilitarian"in self-wrtten prefaces to the local records,i.e.personal interests in public official conducts.The individual case of Jin Zhen also provided a profile with rich connotations for the integration of the literary circle after the change of dynasties.There were many local officials like him who took pride in themselves for their writing capabilities,yet their literary trace were almost worn out by waning memories in history.Investigations of local records compilation which were deeply involved by local officials are probably helpful to reconstruct the literary world of these neglected offical writers.
出处
《中国地方志》
CSSCI
2023年第3期54-64,M0005,共12页
China Local Records