期刊文献+

随机需求下考虑零售商损失厌恶的双渠道供应链融资策略研究

Financing Strategy for a Dual-channel Supply Chain that Faces Loss-averse Retailers and Stochastic Demands
原文传递
导出
摘要 针对随机需求情形下供应链融资策略问题,考虑资金约束零售商的损失厌恶态度,基于Stackelberg博弈分别构建了贸易信贷模型和银行信贷模型,分析了双渠道供应链的最优运营决策,并通过数值分析揭示了零售商的损失厌恶系数和初始资金对供应链运营决策和融资策略的影响。结果表明,零售商的最优订购量关于损失厌恶系数单调递减,且相比于贸易信贷,银行信贷下最优订购量的递减速度较大。损失厌恶系数较大时,零售商和制造商均偏向于银行信贷;反之,双方均偏向于贸易信贷。初始资金较大时,零售商和制造商均偏向于银行信贷;反之,制造商偏向于贸易信贷,零售商偏向于银行信贷,此时制造商可以通过将批发价格限定在一定区间来实现双渠道供应链的帕累托改进。此外,当消费者的零售渠道偏好较大时,银行信贷是双渠道供应链的均衡融资策略。当需求波动较小时,贸易信贷是双方的均衡融资策略。 Financing strategies for a dual channel supply chain that faces stochastic demands and loss-averse and financially constrained retailers are studied.By using the Stackelberg game theory,we establish a trade credit model and a bank credit model and then analyze supply chain members’optimal operational decisions under the two financing models.Our numerical analysis reveals the impact of retailers’loss aversion coefficient and initial capital on their decisions.The results show that retailers’optimal order quantity decreases in line with their loss aversion coefficient,and the decline rate of optimal order quantity under bank credit is larger than that under trade credit.When the loss aversion coefficient is relatively large,retailers and manufacturers prefer bank credit.Otherwise,both sides prefer trade credit.When initial capital is relatively large,retailers and manufacturers prefer bank credit.Otherwise,manufacturers prefer trade credit and retailers prefer bank credit.In this case,manufacturers could achieve Pareto improvement of the dual-channel supply chain by limiting the wholesale price to a certain range.In addition,when consumers prefer retail channel,bank credit is an equilibrium financing strategy for a dual-channel supply chain.When demand fluctuation is small,trade credit is an equilibrium financing strategy for both parties.
作者 王文隆 王梓豪 张涑贤 刘祺 Wang Wenlong;Wang Zihao;Zhang Suxian;Liu Qi(School of Economics&Management,Northwest A&F University,Yangling 712100;School of Management,Xi’an University of Architecture&Technology,Xi’an 710055;School of Management,Xi’an Jiaotong University,Xi’an 710049)
出处 《管理评论》 北大核心 2023年第5期267-279,共13页 Management Review
基金 国家自然科学基金青年项目(72102185,72102176) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(2452021113,2452021171,xpt012021029) 陕西省自然科学基础研究计划青年项目(2021JQ-518)。
关键词 双渠道供应链 损失厌恶 资金约束 贸易信贷 银行信贷 dual-channel supply chain loss-aversion capital constraint trade credit bank credit
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献181

  • 1许民利,向泽华,简惠云.考虑消费者环保意识的WEEE双渠道回收模型[J].控制与决策,2020,35(3):713-720. 被引量:10
  • 2沈厚才,徐进,庞湛.损失规避偏好下的定制件采购决策分析[J].管理科学学报,2004,7(6):37-45. 被引量:44
  • 3张龙,宋士吉,吴澄.Supply Chain Coordination of Loss-Averse Newsvendor with Contract[J].Tsinghua Science and Technology,2005,10(2):133-140. 被引量:27
  • 4周永务.购买费用的滞后支付对库存系统最优订货策略的影响[J].系统工程理论与实践,1997,17(4):116-120. 被引量:26
  • 5Archibald T W, Thomas L C, Betts J M, et ah Should start-up companies be cautious? Inventory policies which maximise survival probabilities[J]. Management Science, 2002, 48(9) : 1161 -1174.
  • 6Sullivan T A, Warren E, Westbrook J. Financial difficulties of small businesses and reasons for their failure. Business bank- ruptcy project[ EB/OD]. http://www, sba. gov/advo/research/rs188tot, pdf, University of Texas at Austin. 1998.
  • 7Mark G, Moosa S. Price-dependent inventory models with discount offers at random times [ J ]. Production and Operations Management, 2002, 11(2): 139-156.
  • 8Abad P L. Optimal policy for a reseller when the supplier offers a temporary reduction in price [ J ]. Decision Sciences, 1997, 28(3): 637-653.
  • 9Xu X D, Brige J R. Operational Decisions, Capital Structure, and Managerial Compensations: A New Vendor Perspective [ R]. Working Paper. Chicago: The University of Chicago Graduate School of Business, 2005.
  • 10Buzacott J A, Zhang R Q. Inventory management with asset-based financing[ J]. Management Science, 2004, 50(9) : 1274 - 1292.

共引文献227

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部