期刊文献+

基于实践探究模型的医学英语混合学习支架设计

Design of Scaffolding in Blended Learning of Medical English Based on Practical Inquiry Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着数字技术的飞速发展,集合课堂教学与线上学习优势的混合式教学,打破了相对封闭的教学环境,促进了学习的个性化和自主化发展,为“医学英语”教学改革带来了新的发展机遇。然而,在缺乏教师指导的“医学英语”混合式学习中,学生容易出现偏离方向、进展受阻、交互质量低等问题。为了解决上述问题,在实践探究模型的基础上设计混合学习支架模型,并开展教学实验,对单元测试成绩、智慧平台数据、问卷调查及访谈数据进行分析。结果显示,适时、适度搭建学习支架,能够有效提高测试成绩和学习满意度,有利于培养学生的高阶思维能力,促进深度学习。 The rise of digital technology has led to the arising and development of blended learning,which integrates technology and digital media with traditional instructor-led classroom activities,giving students more flexibility to customize their learning experiences.However,problems may arise without a suitable level of guidance in blended learning of Medical English,such as deviation from learning goals,slow progress and poor quality of interaction.This study designs and implements a blended learning scaffolding model on the base of the Practical Inquiry Model.Data including unit test scores,smart platform data,questionnaires and interviews are analyzed.Results show that using timely and appropriate scaffolding helps improve students’performance and learning satisfaction,especially in higher-order thinking and deep learning.
作者 刘烜 王强 LIU Xuan;WANG Qiang(Department of Public Education,Gansu Medical College,Pingliang,Gansu 744000,China)
出处 《教育教学论坛》 2023年第24期143-148,共6页 Education And Teaching Forum
基金 2021年度甘肃省教育厅高等学校英语教学改革研究项目“医学英语课程思政改革的探索与实践”(Y202110) 2020年度甘肃省教育厅高等学校英语教学改革研究项目“医学英语线上线下混合教学模式研究”(Y202012) 2022年度甘肃省教育厅高校大学生就业创业能力提升工程项目“学生就业创业社区”(甘教财[2022]43号)。
关键词 实践探究模型 学习支架 医学英语 混合学习 practical inquiry model scaffolding Medical English blended learning
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献61

  • 1陈佑清.反思学习:涵义、功能与过程[J].教育学术月刊,2010(5):5-9. 被引量:71
  • 2陈悦,陈超美,刘则渊,胡志刚,王贤文.CiteSpace知识图谱的方法论功能[J].科学学研究,2015,33(2):242-253. 被引量:6718
  • 3何玲,黎加厚.促进学生深度学习[J].计算机教与学.现代教学,2005(5):29-30. 被引量:1312
  • 4Remesal, A., & Friesen, N.. Inquiry into "Communities of Inquiry" : Knowledge, Communication, Presence, Community [J]. E- Leaming and Digital Media, 2014, 11 ( 1 ) : 28-45.
  • 5Moreira, J. A., Ferreira, A. G., & Almeida, A. C.. Comparing Communities of Inquiry of Portuguese Higher Education Students: One for All or One for Each.'? [J]. Open Praxis,2013, 5(2) : 165-178.
  • 6Yu, T., & Richardson, J. C.. Examining Reliability and Validity of A Korean Version of the Community of Inquiry Instrument Using Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis [J]. The Internet and Higher Education, 2015,25 (4) : 45-52.
  • 7Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W.. Critical Thinking, Cognitive Presence, and Computer Conferencing in Distance Education [J]. American Journal of Distance Education, 2001,15 (1) : 7-23.
  • 8Vaughan, N., & Garrison, D. R.. Creating Cognitive Presence in A Blended Faculty Development Community [J]. The Internet and Higher Education, 2005,8(2) : 1-12.
  • 9Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W.. Critical Thinking, Cognitive Presence, and Computer Conferencing in Distance Education [J]. The American Journal of Distance Education ,2001,15( 1 ):7-23.
  • 10Meyer, K.. Face-to-Face Versus Threaded Discussions : The Role of Time and Higher-Order Thinking [J]. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 2003, 7(3):55-65.

共引文献166

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部