期刊文献+

踝上弧形截骨联合关节牵伸治疗内翻型踝关节炎

Supramalleolar Domeshaped Osteotomy Combined with Ilizarov Distraction Arthroplasty in the Treatment of Varus Ankle Osteoarthritis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评估踝上弧形截骨联合关节牵伸治疗内翻型踝关节炎的临床效果。方法回顾性分析2009年12月至2021年4月北京市垂杨柳医院骨二科治疗的8例内翻型踝关节炎病人的临床资料,男5例,女3例,年龄为(35.2±9.1)岁(27~45岁)。其中有踝部骨折史者5例,骨骺损伤后遗踝内翻畸形3例。应用踝上胫腓骨弧形截骨矫正踝内翻后安装Ilizarov踝关节牵伸器,术后行踝关节牵伸,维持关节间隙至5~8 mm行走3个月以上。根据病人手术前后胫骨远端关节面角(tibial articular surface angle,TAS)及美国足踝外科医师协会(American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society,AOFAS)踝与后足功能评分评估临床治疗效果。结果8例病人随访时间为(31.5±17.9)个月(12~72个月),外固定佩戴时间为(29.4±5.1)周(20~32周)。拆除外固定时截骨处均达到临床骨愈合标准,末次随访时AOFAS评分为(82.0±7.7)分(76~90分),TAS角度为91.1°±2.4°(89.6°~95.0°),与术前比较[(47.6±3.7)分(41~65分),82.9°±4.7°(72°~87°)],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。8例术后均出现局部针道感染,5例给予局部酒精敷料缠绕包扎,3例拔出感染固定针后感染控制。2例固定针折断,去除外固定装置时给予拔除,无其他严重并发症。结论踝上弧形截骨术联合踝关节牵伸成形治疗内翻型踝关节炎,矫正踝内翻效果满意,避免植骨内固定,截骨愈合良好。结合Ilizarov外固定牵伸,允许术后全负重行走锻炼,显著改善病人足踝功能,值得临床推广应用。 Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of supramalleolar domeshaped osteotomy combined with Ilizarov joint distraction in the treatment of varus ankle osteoarthritis.Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 8 cases of varus ankle arthritis treated by Beijing Chuiyangliu Hospital from December 2009 to April 2021.There were 5 males and 3 females in this group with age of(35.2±9.1)years(27⁃45 years).Five patients had a history of ankle fractures,and three patients had ankle varus deformity after metaphyseal injury.Supramalleolar tibial domeshaped osteotomy was used to immediately correct the ankle varus,and then Ilizarov ankle joint external fixator was installed.The ankle joint was drafted to keep joint clearance at 5 mm to 8 mm for walking over 3 months.During the treatment period,the patients can do light weight walking.The clinical treatment effect was evaluated according to the patients distal articular surface angle(TAS)and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society(AOFAS)ankle and hind foot function score before and after surgery.Results The follow⁃up time of 8 patients was(31.5±17.9)months(12⁃72 months),and the wearing time of external fixation was(29.4±5.1)weeks(20⁃32 weeks).At the time of removing the external fixation,the osteotomy sites all met the clinical bone healing standards.At the last follow⁃up,the AOFAS score was 82.0±7.7(76⁃90),and the TAS angle was 91.1°±2.4°(89.6°⁃95.0°).Compared with preoperative scores[47.6±3.7(41⁃65),82.9°±4.7°(72°⁃87°)],the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).All 8 cases experienced local needle infection after surgery,5 cases were wrapped with local alcohol dressing,and 3 cases were controlled after removing the infectious fixing needle.Two cases of broken fixed needles were removed when removing the external fixation device,and there were no other serious complications.Conclusion Supramalleolar domeshaped osteotomy combined with Ilizarov distraction arthroplasty in the treatment of varus ankle osteoarthritis can achieve satisfy correction of ankle valgus deformity,avoid bone graft with internal fixation,and obtain good osteotomy bone healing.Combined use of Ilizarov external fixation and ankle joint distraction allows postoperative full⁃weight walking exercise and significantly improves patientsfoot and ankle function in patients,which is worthy of clinical application.
作者 郭保逢 秦泗河 王洁颖 赵巍 吴鸿飞 郑学建 GUO Baofeng;QIN Sihe;WANG Jieying;ZHAO Wei;WU Hongfei;ZHENG Xuejian(Department of Orthopaedics,Beijing Chuiyangliu Hospital,Beijing 100022,China;Department of Orthopaedics,Rehabilitation Hospital of the National Research Center for Rehabilitation Technical Aids,Beijing 100176,China)
出处 《骨科》 CAS 2023年第4期338-342,共5页 ORTHOPAEDICS
关键词 弧形截骨术 踝上截骨 ILIZAROV技术 关节牵伸 内翻畸形 踝骨性关节炎 Domeshped osteotomy Supramalleolar osteotomy Ilizarov technique Joint distraction arthroplasty Varus deformity Ankle osteoarthritis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献14

  • 1Hintermann B. Total ankle arthroplasty: historical overview, cur.rent concepts and future perspectives[M]. New York: Springer,2005: 35-52.
  • 2Fuchs S, Sandmann C, Skwara A, et al. Quality of life 20 yearsafter arthrodesis of the ankle. A study of adjacent joints[J]. J BoneJoint Surg Br, 2003, 85(7): 994-998.
  • 3Pagenstert G, Leumann A, Hintermann B, et al. Sports andrecreation activity of varus and valgus ankle osteoarthritis beforeand after realignment surgery[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2008, 29(10):985-993.
  • 4Takakura Y, Takaoka T, Tanaka Y, et al. Results of opening.wedgeosteotomy for the treatment of a post.traumatic varus deformity ofthe ankle[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1998, 80(8): 213-218.
  • 5Lee WC, Moon JS, Lee K, et al. Indications for supramalleolar oste.otomy in patients with ankle osteoarthritis and varus deformity[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2011, 93(13): 1243-1248.
  • 6Knupp M, Stufkens SA, Bolliger L, et al. Classification and treat.ment of supramalleolar deformities[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2011, 32(11): 1023-1031.
  • 7Tanaka Y, Takakura Y, Hayashi K, et al. Low tibial osteotomy forvarus.type osteoarthritis of the ankle[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br,2006, 88(7): 909-913.
  • 8郑修存, 李超发, 孟凡军, 等. 踝内翻2例报告[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2001, 8(2): 152.
  • 9Lubicky JP, Altiok H. Transphyseal osteotomy of the distal tibiafor correction of valgus/varus deformities of the ankle[J]. J PediatrOrthop, 2001, 21(1): 80-88.
  • 10秦泗河,蔡刚,葛建忠.关节牵伸术在下肢骨关节炎中的治疗作用[J].中华外科杂志,2010,48(2):146-148. 被引量:10

共引文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部