摘要
通过对《中药新药临床研究指导原则》《中医病证诊断疗效标准》《中医外科学》《中西医结合外科学》《实用中医男科学》《中西医结合男科学》、专病会议指南和学术界对勃起功能障碍的中医辨证综合对比分析,发现各辨证标准文献之间、学术界与辨证标准文献之间及学术界内部均存在较大差异,文章全面分析了辨证混乱的严重情况及其成因,并给出重新辨证规范的思路与方法。
Through the comprehensive comparative analysis of the guiding principles for clinical research of new traditional Chinese medicine,the diagnostic efficacy standard of traditional Chinese medicine syndrome,thesurgery of traditional Chinese medicine,the surgery of integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine,the malescience of practical traditional Chinese medicine,the male science of integrated traditional Chinese and westernmedicine,the guidelines of special disease conference and the Chinese medicine syndrome differentiation of erectiledysfunction in academic circles,it is found that there are great differences among the literature of various syndromedifferentiation standards,between academic circles and syndrome differentiation standard literature,as well as withinacademic circles.This paper comprehensively analyzes the serious situation and causes of syndrome differentiationanomie,and gives the ideas and methods of re-syndrome differentiation standardization.
作者
李亿
李国信
梁茂新
梁丽喆
LI Yi;LI Guoxin;LIANG Maoxin;LIANG Lizhe(Department of Surgery,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Shenyang 110034,Liaoning,China;Office of Subject Degrees,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Shenyang 110034,Liaoning,China)
出处
《中国性科学》
2023年第7期116-120,共5页
Chinese Journal of Human Sexuality
基金
李国信辽宁省名中医传承工作室(辽中医药函[2021]1号)。
关键词
勃起功能障碍
辨证混乱
辨证规范
Erectile dysfunction
Anomie of syndrome differentiation
Differentiation standard