期刊文献+

基于LERT-RCNN的中文弹幕文本情感多分类研究

Multiply classification of Chinese barrage screen based on LERT-RCNN
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为提高弹幕文本情感分类准确率,提出基于LERT-RCNN的弹幕文本情感多分类模型。首先使用LERT预训练语言模型获取文本动态特征表示,减少弹幕文本中一词多义对情感分类准确率带来的影响;其次使用BiLSTM和CNN提取更深层次语义特征;最后经全连接层后送入softmax函数得到情感分类结果。实验结果表明,基于LERT-RCNN的弹幕文本情感分类模型的准确率、精确率、召回率及F1值分别为96.17%、94.54%、92.56%及93.51%,与传统文本情感分析模型及单一预训练语言模型LERT相比有明显提升。 In order to improve the classification accuracy of barrage screen sentiment,a multi-classification model of barrage screen sentiment based on LERT-RCNN is proposed.Firstly,the LERT pre-training language model is used to obtain the dynamic feature representation of text to reduce the influence of polysemy on the accuracy of sentiment classification for barrage screen.Secondly,BiLSTM and CNN are used to extract deeper semantic features.Finally,the sentiment classification results are obtained through the full connection layer and fed into the sofamax function.The experimental results show that the accuracy,precision,recall and F1-score of the barrage screen sentiment classification model based on LERT-RCNN are 96.17%,94.54%,92.56%and 93.51%,respectively,which is significantly improved compared with the traditional text sentiment analysis model and single pretraining language model.
作者 孔玲玲 黄旭 曾孟佳 Kong Lingling;Huang Xu;Zeng Mengjia(School of Information Engineering,Huzhou University,Huzhou 313000,China;School of Electronic Information,Huzhou College,Huzhou 313000,China)
出处 《现代计算机》 2023年第12期1-9,共9页 Modern Computer
基金 湖州市科技计划工业公关项目(GG201829) 湖州市2022科技特派员专项(2021KT02)。
关键词 弹幕 情感分类 卷积神经网络 预训练语言模型 双向长短时记忆网络 barrage screen sentiment classification convelutional neutral network pre-training language model binary long short time model
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献104

  • 1陶志勇,李小兵,刘影,刘晓芳.基于双向长短时记忆网络的改进注意力短文本分类方法[J].数据分析与知识发现,2019,3(12):21-29. 被引量:23
  • 2毕达宇,张苗苗,曹安冉.基于情感依恋的用户高质量在线评论信息生成模式[J].情报科学,2020,0(2):47-51. 被引量:5
  • 3AcFun 弹幕视频网[DB/OL]. [2015-04-17]. hrtp://www.acfun.tv/.
  • 4哔哩哔哩弹幕视频网[DB/OL].[2015-04-17]. http://www.bilibili.com/.
  • 5Pang B, Lee L. Thumbs up.: Sentiment Classification UsingMachine Learning Techniques [C]. In: Proceedings of theConference on Empirical Methods in NLP. Morristown: ACL,2002: 79-86.
  • 6Yu H, Hatzivassiloglou V. Towards Answering OpinionQuestions: Separating Facts from Opinions and Identifyingthe Polarity of Opinion Sentences [C]. In: Proceedings of theConference on Empirical Methods in NLP. Morristown: ACL,2003:129-136.
  • 7Hu M, Liu B. Mining and Summarizing Customer Reviews[C]. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM SIGKDD InternationalConference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. NewYork: ACM, 2004:168-177.
  • 8Kim S M, Hovy E. Determining the Sentiment of Opinions[C]. ImProceedings of the 20th International Conference onComputational Linguistics. Morristown: ACL, 2004:1367-1373.
  • 9Yang S, Li S, Zheng L, et al. Emotion Mining Reasearch onMicroblog [C]. In: Proceedings of the 1st IEEE Symposiumon Web Society (SWS’09). 2009: 71-75.
  • 10刨丁解羊中文分词器v3.2 [K/OL]. [2015-04-17]. http://www.crsky.com/soft/22209.html.

共引文献109

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部