摘要
近年来,“韧性”问题逐渐成为国内外城市研究和政策实践领域关注的热点,而现有文献关于城市韧性构建模式的讨论尚未形成统一的认识。为更好推进中国现阶段城市韧性建设研究与实践,基于比较制度分析理论,通过全球代表性城市的多案例比较发现,城市韧性构建在不同制度条件下展现出不同的特点,政府与社会的关系是其核心区别。中国的“国家统合型”城市韧性建设模式是契合本国国情及本土制度环境的必然选择,同时也需要汲取他国城市韧性建设的有益经验,建设具有中国特色的韧性城市。
In recent years, “resilience” has gradually become a hot topic in urban research and policy practice at home and abroad. However, the study finds that there are objections to the construction model of urban resilience, and under the dual framework of “state-society”, they either tend to build a resilient order led by social self-organization, or emphasize the importance of good government governance, and some scholars propose that the construction of urban resilience needs to respect social and political differences. In order to better promote the construction of urban resilience in China at the current stage, based on comparative institutional analysis theory, through the comparison of multiple cases of representative cities around the world, it is found that the construction of urban resilience shows different characteristics under different institutional conditions, and the relationship between government and society is the core. China's “national integration” urban resilience model is an inevitable result that adapts to our national conditions and institutional environment, but it also needs to absorb the useful experience of other countries' urban resilience construction to build resilient cities with Chinese characteristics.
作者
苗婷婷
单菁菁
MIAO Ting-ting;SHAN Jing-jing
出处
《城市问题》
CSSCI
北大核心
2023年第5期24-33,共10页
Urban Problems
基金
国家社会科学基金重点项目(21AZD043)——“基于人与自然耦合系统的黄河流域城市群高质量发展研究”
首都经济贸易大学新入职青年教师科研启动基金项目(XRZ2022011)——“城市韧性理论的本土化研究”。
关键词
城市韧性
韧性模式
社会能动型
国家统合型
缓和合作型
urban resilience
resilience model
social activism model
national integration model
moderated coopera-tive model