期刊文献+

核电工程中累积绝对速度阈值保守性评价研究

Study of the conservative evaluation method of cumulative absolute velocity threshold
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文介绍了累积绝对速度标准化计算方法,梳理了核电站地震报警阈值选取原则和现状,统计我国历次地震事件的强震记录,采用标准累积绝对速度计算方法,评价我国核电工程累积绝对速度阈值的保守性。通过计算强震记录峰值加速度与累积绝对速度相关关系,统计分析不同峰值加速度区间内累积绝对速度计算值的分布特征,及其与累积绝对速度0.16 g·s阈值的关系。结果表明:我国强震记录的峰值加速度在0.1~0.15 g区间时,选取0.16 g·s作为核电工程破坏阈值是相对保守的,当PGA小于0.1 g时,该阈值是偏不保守的。 The conservative evaluation method of CAV threshold applied to seismic monitoring in China is analyzed and studied by screening the strong earthquake records of seismic events in China with the method of standard cumulative absolute velocity.By analyzing the correlation between peak acceleration and cumulative absolute velocity,the cumulative absolute velocity is divided into grades,and the distribution characteristics of the calculated value of cumulative absolute velocity in different peak ground acceleration intervals and its relationship with 0.16 g·s threshold are statistically analyzed.The results show that CAV as the damage threshold is relatively conservativein the range of 0.1~0.15 g of peak ground acceleration.When it is greater than 0.15 g,the threshold is too conservative,and when less than 0.1 g,the threshold is not conservative.
作者 杨智博 杨宇 潘蓉 李亮 任国鹏 王恒 YANG Zhibo;YANG Yu;PAN Rong;LI Liang;REN Guopeng;WANG Heng(Nuclear and Radiation Safety Center,Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People′s Republic of China,Beijing 100082,China)
出处 《世界地震工程》 北大核心 2023年第3期174-182,共9页 World Earthquake Engineering
基金 国家重点研发计划“安全壳与堆坑混凝土老化效应评价与预测模型研究”(2019YFB1900903) 国家重点研发计划“核电站地震紧急处置技术研究及示范应用”(2017YFC1500804)。
关键词 累积绝对速度 峰值加速度 阈值 保守性 核电站 cumulative absolute velocity peak ground acceleration conservative threshold nuclear power plant
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献51

  • 1樊艳.京津城际高速铁路地震监控系统技术方案探讨[J].铁路技术创新,2010(5):116-119. 被引量:5
  • 2陈培善,陈海通.由二维破裂模式导出的地震定标律[J].地震学报,1989,11(4):337-350. 被引量:21
  • 3中国地震局地球物理研究所.2005.广东阳江核电站厂址地震安全性评价报告[R].北京:中国地震局地球物理研究所:128-141.
  • 4Bolt B A. 1973. Duration of strong ground motion[C]//Proc Fifth World Conf Earth Eng: 1304-1307.
  • 5Electric Power Research Institute. 1988. A Criterion for Determining Exceedance of the Operating Basis Earthquake[R] //EPRI Report NP-5930: 1-28.
  • 6Electric Power Research Corporation. 1991. Standardization of the Cumulative Absolute Velocity[R]//EPRIReport TR- 100082: 1-20.
  • 7EPRI, Palo Alto, the US Department of Energy. 2006. Program on Technology Innovation: Use of Cumulative Absolute Velocity (CAV) in Determining Effects of Small Magnitude Earthquakes on Seismic Hazard Analyses[R]//EPRI Report TR-1014099: 1-40.
  • 8Hanks T C, Kanamori H. 1979. A moment magnitude scale[J]. J Geophys Res, 84(B5): 2348-2350.
  • 9孙汉武,王澜,戴贤春,穆恩生,刘敬辉.高速铁路地震紧急自动处置系统的研究[J].中国铁道科学,2007,28(5):121-127. 被引量:40
  • 10Robert L N. Application of cumulative absolute velocity to real-time earthquake damage assessment[EB/OL], http://www, eqsafetysys, com/cav_ paper, htm.

共引文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部