认罪认罚案件上诉问题研究——基于172份刑事二审裁判文书的分析

Study on the Appeal of Guilty Plea Cases:Based on an Analysis of 172 Criminal Second Instance Judgment Documents

刑事诉讼法没有限制认罪认罚案件被告人的上诉权,但目前立法对被追诉人反悔的相关规定还不够完善。司法实践中被追诉人通过认罪认罚从宽制度获得量刑优惠后,又基于上诉不加刑原则而反悔意图谋求二次利益,或提出“技术性上诉”的情形时有发生,由此出现了“上诉引发抗诉”的现象。对此,应以被追诉人反悔制度规范为基础,分析反悔现象发生的原因后针对突出问题逐个解决,以应对和规制被追诉人反悔,为认罪认罚从宽制度的深入适用排除障碍,确保该制度实现其应然价值。

The criminal Procedure Law does not limit the appeal right of the defendant in a case of guilty plea and punishment,but the relevant provisions of the current legislation on the prosecution person are not perfect enough.After the prosecution obtains preferential sentencing through the lenient punishment system of guilty plea,he also goes back to seek secondary interests based on the principle of appeal without additional punishment,or proposes a"technical appeal",resulting in the phenomenon of"appeal causes protest".It is necessary to clarify the norms of the prosecution violation system,analyze the causes of the prominent problems one by one,so as to respond to and regulate the accused person to go back,remove obstacles for the further application of the lenient punishment system for guilty plea,and ensure that the system realizes its proper value.