期刊文献+

肌钙蛋白、SNYTAX积分、GRACE评分与老年冠心病PCI术后再次血运重建的关系 被引量:2

Relationship between Troponin,SNYTAX score,GRACE score and revascularization after PCI in elderly patients with coronary heart disease
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨肌钙蛋白I(cTnI)、SNYTAX积分、全球急性冠状动脉疾病登记(GRACE)评分与老年冠心病PCI术后再次血运重建的关系。方法选取2016年1月-2021年1月中国人民解放军陆军第七十一集团军医院心血管内科收治PCI治疗老年冠心病患者300例,基于PCI术后冠状动脉造影检查结果是否需要再次血运重建分为再次血运重建组(A组)91例和非再次血运重建组(B组)209例。比较2组患者临床资料及cTnI、SNYTAX积分、GRACE评分,Logistic回归分析再次血运重建影响因素,受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析cTnI、SNYTAX积分、GRACE评分诊断再次血运重建的效能。结果A组cTnI水平、SNYTAX积分、GRACE评分高于B组(t=4.802、10.080、8.744,P均<0.001),cTnI高、SNYTAX积分高、GRACE评分高均是影响再次血运重建的危险因素[OR(95%CI)=7.581(1.655~9.558)、2.585(2.055~5.065)、1.832(1.234~4.276)];ROC曲线分析显示,高cTnI、SNYTAX积分、GRACE评分及三者联合检测的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.628、0.802、0.795、0.876,三者联合优于各自单独预测价值(Z=6.823、3.064、3.589,P均<0.001)。结论cTnI、SNYTAX积分、GRACE评分与老年冠心病PCI术后再次血运重建有关,上述指标联合检测可作为再次血运重建预测指标。 Objective To explore the relationship between Troponin I(cTnI),SNYTAX score,Global Registry of Acute Coronary artery disease(GRACE)score and revascularization after PCI in elderly patients with coronary heart disease.Methods From January 2016 to January 2021,300 elderly patients with coronary heart disease treated by PCI were selected from the Department of Cardiology of the Seventy First Army Hospital of the 71st Group Army.Based on the results of coronary angiography after PCI,they were divided into 91 patients in the revascularization group(Group A)and 209 patients in the non-revascularization group(Group B).Compare the clinical data,cTnI,SNYTAX scores,and GRACE scores of two groups of patients,conduct logistic regression analysis on the influencing factors of revascularization,and analyze the efficacy of cTnI,SNYTAX scores,and GRACE scores in diagnosing revascularization using receiver operating characteristic curve(ROC)analysis.Result The cTnI level,SNYTAX score,and GRACE score in Group A were higher than those in Group B(t=4.802,10.080,8.744,P<0.001).High cTnI,SNYTAX score,and GRACE score were all risk factors affecting revascularization[OR(95%CI)=7.581(1.655-9.558),2.585(2.055-5.065),1.832(1.234-4.276)];The Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the area under the curve(AUC)of high cTnI,SNYTAX score,GRACE score and joint detection of the three were 0.628,0.802,0.795 and 0.876,respectively,which were better than their individual predictive values(Z=6.823,3.064,3.589,P<0.001).Conclusion cTnI,SNYTAX score,and GRACE score are related to revascularization after PCI in elderly patients with coronary heart disease.Combined detection of these indicators can serve as predictive indicators for revascularization.
作者 周晓丹 王岩 项军 项楚涵 田静 潘德锋 Zhou Xiaodan;Wang Yan;Xiang Jun;Xiang Chuhan;Tian Jing;Pan Defeng(Department of Cardiovascular Medicine,the 71st Army Hospital of the People's Liberation Army,Xuzhou,Jiangsu 221000)
出处 《疑难病杂志》 CAS 2023年第8期824-828,共5页 Chinese Journal of Difficult and Complicated Cases
基金 中国人民解放军陆军第七十一集团军医院课题(YNMS2020003)。
关键词 冠心病 经皮冠状动脉介入 再次血运重建 肌钙蛋白I SNYTAX积分 全球急性冠状动脉疾病登记评分 预测价值 老年人 Coronary heart disease(CHD) Percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) Revascularization Troponin I(cTnI) Global Registry of Acute Coronary artery disease(GRACE) Predictive value Elderly
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

二级参考文献103

  • 1中国心血管健康与疾病报告编写组,王增武,胡盛寿.中国心血管健康与疾病报告2019概要[J].中华老年病研究电子杂志,2020(4):4-15. 被引量:918
  • 2赵素华,朱世琼,李亚梅,徐泽俊.急性心肌梗死患者PCI术后心功能运动康复效果及影响因素分析[J].湖南师范大学学报(医学版),2020,17(1):73-76. 被引量:15
  • 3王云川,常学锋,刘国辉,陶贵周.SYNTAX评分对急性心肌梗死患者急诊PCI术后无复流现象的预测价值[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(1):39-42. 被引量:16
  • 4汤立军,王丹,邹祎,谭文锋,冼伟进,余泽洪,陈小林.不稳定型心绞痛患者介入治疗前后C-反应蛋白及肌钙蛋白I的变化及对预后的预测价值[J].中国实用内科杂志,2007,27(12):962-964. 被引量:3
  • 5Patel MR, Dehmer GJ, Hirshfeld JW, et al. ACCF/SCAI/STS/ AATS/AHA/ASNC 2009 Appropriateness Criteria for Coronary Revascularization: a report by the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriateness Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology Endorsed by the American Society of Echocardiography, the Heart Failure Society of America, and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2009, 53: 530-553.
  • 6Patel MR, Dehmer GJ, Hirshfeld JW, et al. ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/ AHA/ASNCIHFSA/SCCT 2012 Appropriate use criteria for coronary rcvascularization focused update: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2012, 59: 857-881.
  • 7Bradley SM, Spertus JA, Kennedy KF, et al.Patient selection for diagnostic coronary angiography and hospltal-level pereutaneous coronary interventionappropriateness: insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. JAMA Intern Med, 2014, 174: 1630-1639.
  • 8Chart PS, Rao SV, Bhatt DL, et al. Patient and hospital characteristics associated with inappropriate percutaneous coronary interventions.J Am Coil Cardiol, 2013, 62: 2274-2281.
  • 9Ko DT1, Guo H, Wijeysundera HC, et al. Assessing the association of appropriateness of coronary revascularization and clinical outcomes for patients with stable coronary artery disease.J Am Coil Cardiol, 2012, 60: 1876-1884.
  • 10Chan PS, Patel MR, Klein LW, et al. Appropriateness of percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA, 2011,306: 53-61.

共引文献178

同被引文献24

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部