期刊文献+

碳限额下考虑风险规避的低碳供应链联合减排决策研究 被引量:1

Study on Joint Emission Reduction Decision-making of Low-carbon Supply Chain Considering Risk Aversion under Carbon Caps
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在一个制造商和一个零售商组成的二级供应链中,探讨碳限额和供应链成员风险规避行为对系统成员决策的影响,最后通过数值算例进行验证。研究结果表明:碳限额交易政策下拥有主导权企业获利更多,调整碳交易价格可以有效协调供应链成员的利润;系统成员风险规避特性不利于制造商和零售商的联合碳减排,且对系统成员自身效用具有负效应;零售商分担减排成本行为能减弱制造商风险规避特性对其自身效用的负效应,却加重了自身风险规避特性对效用的损害;集中决策下的联合减排效果最佳,分散决策下供应链效益更优。 The impact of Carbon Caps and the risk aversion characteristics of system members on system optimal decisions for a supply chain consisting of a single manufacturer and a single retailer was studied.Numerical examples are used for verification.The results show that the dominant firm is more profitable under a cap-and-trade policy,but can harmonize the profits of supply chain members by adjusting the price of carbon trading.The risk aversion characteristics of system members is not conducive to the joint carbon reduction of manufacturers and retailers,and it has a negative effect on the utility of system members.Retailers’sharing of abatement costs can weaken the negative effects of manufacturers’risk aversion characteristics on their own utility,but increases the damage to their own utility.Joint emission reductions are better under centralized decision-making,while supply chain benefits are better under decentralized decision-making.
作者 张娜 张克勇 ZHANG Na;ZHANG Keyong(Xi'an Eurasia University,Xi'an 710065;School of Economics and Management,North University of China,Taiyuan 030051)
出处 《工程数学学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2023年第4期576-590,共15页 Chinese Journal of Engineering Mathematics
基金 山西省社科联重点课题(SSKLZDKT2020086).
关键词 低碳供应链 碳限额 风险规避 联合减排 low carbon supply chain carbon caps risk aversion joint emission reduction
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献117

  • 1赵道致,王楚格.考虑低碳政策的供应链企业减排决策研究[J].工业工程,2014,17(1):105-111. 被引量:19
  • 2许明辉,于刚,张汉勤.带有缺货惩罚的报童模型中的CVaR研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2006,26(10):1-8. 被引量:92
  • 3张靖江.考虑碳排放许可与交易的排放依赖型生产运作优化[D].合肥:中国科学技术大学,2010.
  • 4Van den Akker I J G. Carbon regulated supply chains: Calculating and reducing carbon dioxide emissions for an eye health company [D]. Copen- hagen: Eindhoven University of Technology, 2009.
  • 5Boere S. Carbon regulated supply chains: Assessing and reducing carbon dioxide emissions in transport at cargill cocoa chocolate [D]. Copenhagen: Eind- hoven University of Technology, 2010.
  • 6HoenKMR, TanT, FransooJ C, etal. Efect of carbon emission regulations on transport mode selection under stochastic demand [R/OL]. Working Paper Series, The Beta Research School for Operations Management and Logistics, May 2011, http://cms, ieis. tue. nl/Beta/Files/WorkingPapers/ wD 349. )df. 2011.
  • 7Sadegheih A. Optimal design methodologies under the carbon emission trading program using MIP, GA, SA and TS [J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2011, 15(1): 504-513.
  • 8Elhedhti S, Merrick R. Green supply chain network design to reduce carbon emissions[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2012, 17(5) :370-379.
  • 9Giarola S, Shah N, Bezzo F. A comprehensive approach to the design of ethanol supply chains including carbon trading effects [ J ]. Bioresource Technology, 2012,107 : 175-185.
  • 10Chaabane A, Ramudhin A, Paquet M. Design of sustainable supply chains under the emission trading scheme [ J ]. International Journatl Production Economies, 2012,135: 37-49.

共引文献106

同被引文献16

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部