期刊文献+

肿瘤科护士恶性伤口管理知信行问卷的编制及信度效度检验 被引量:3

Development and reliability and validity test of the knowledge,attitude and practice questionnaire for malignant wound nursing in oncology department
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:编制适用于肿瘤科护士恶性伤口管理知信行问卷,并检验其信度、效度,为临床恶性伤口评估提供有效工具。方法:通过文献查阅、专家函询、预调查形成初始问卷,并对全国687名肿瘤科护士进行正式调查,采用Cronbach’sα系数、折半信度、重测信度、内容效度、探索性因子分析及验证性因子分析进行问卷的信度、效度检验。结果:问卷共3个维度,56个条目。问卷的Cronbach’sα系数为0.954、分半信度为0.950、重测信度为0.947;内容效度指数为0.982,各条目的内容效度指数为0.875~1.000。结论:本问卷具有良好的信度及效度,可作为评估肿瘤科护士恶性伤口管理知信行的工具。 Objective:To develop a questionnaire on the Knowledge,Attitude and Practice(KAP)questionnaire for malignant wound management for oncology nurses and test its reliability and validity.Methods:An initial questionnaire was developed by referring to relevant domestic and foreign literature,expert consultation and pre-investigations,and a formal investigation was then carried out among 687 oncology nurses in China,after which the reliability and validity of the questionnaire were tested in terms of the Cronbach'sαcoefficient,split-half reliability,test-retest reliability,content validity,exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis.Results:The questionnaire covered 3 dimensions and 56 entries totally with the Cronbach'sαcoefficient being 0.954,the split-half reliability being 0.950,the test-retest reliability being 0.947,the content validity index(S-CVI)being 0.982,and the content validity index of each entry(I-CVI)being 0.875-1.000.Conclusion:This questionnaire can be used as the tool to evaluate the malignant wound management KAP for oncology nurses due to its good reliability and validity.
作者 曹祥 田军 吕治华 马玉文 关睿琦 侯春雨 于子然 朱明月 尤渺宁 CAO Xiang;TIAN Jun;LYU Zhihua;MA Yuwen;GUAN Ruiqi;HOU Chunyu;YU Ziran;ZHU Mingyue;YOU Miaoning(Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research(Ministry of Education/Beijing),Department of Breast Oncology,Peking University Cancer Hospital&Institute,Beijing,100142,China)
出处 《中国护理管理》 CSCD 2023年第7期1008-1013,共6页 Chinese Nursing Management
关键词 肿瘤科护士 恶性伤口管理 知信行 信度 效度 oncology nurse malignant wounds management KAP reliability validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献143

共引文献1746

同被引文献24

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部