期刊文献+

证券分析师估值模型选择偏好及其对目标价的影响研究——基于企业特征角度

Research on the Choice Preference of Security Analysts Valuation Model and Its Influence on the Target Price:Based on the Enterprise Characteristics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以2017—2020年证券分析师研报为依据,将分析师估值模型选择偏好与分析师目标价结合探讨,并率先提出目标价投资参考价值这一全新概念且对其评估方法进行设计。研究发现,分析师存在特定的估值模型类型偏好,并且在不同行业中偏好不同的估值模型。然而,分析师偏好的估值模型不一定能够生成质量良好的目标价。对于不同特征的企业,分析师存在迥然各异的估值模型选择偏好,该偏好对目标价具有显著影响。结论可帮助分析师优化估值模型选择,提高目标价质量。 Based on securities analyst research reports from 2017 to 2020,this paper discusses analysts preference for model selection and analysts target price,and takes the lead in proposing the new concept of target price investment reference value and designing its evaluation method.The results show that analysts have specific preferences for valuation model and prefer different valuation models in different industries.However,analysts preferred valuation models may not necessarily generate high-quality target prices.For enterprises with different characteristics,analysts have different preferences for valuation model selection,which has a significant impact on the target price.The conclusion can help analysts optimize the selection of valuation model selection and improve the quality of target prices.
作者 李彦甫 LI Yanfu(School of Economics and Management,Chengdu Technological University,Chengdu 611730,China;Faculty of Agribusiness,Lincoln University,Christchurch 7647,New Zealand)
出处 《南京审计大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2023年第4期70-80,共11页 Journal of Nanjing Audit University
基金 四川省资产评估协会立项资助课题(SCPXKT202207) 2022年成都市哲学社会科学规划项目(2022CZ059) 四川省高校人文社科重点研究基地水运经济研究中心项目(SYJJ2022B03) 四川石油天然气发展研究中心2023年度课题(川油气科SKZ23-06)。
关键词 分析师 估值模型偏好 目标价 企业特征 研究报告 公司估值 证券投资 analyst preference for valuation model target price enterprise characteristics research report company valuation security investment
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献27

  • 1胡光耀,樊明太.资管新规下资产配置数量方法应用研究——基于改进Black-Litterman模型的上证50指数增强策略[J].价格理论与实践,2019(11):101-104. 被引量:2
  • 2Banerjee, A.. Real option valuation of a pharmaceutical company [J]. The Journal for Decision Makers, 2003, (02): 61-73.
  • 3Cheng, C.S. and McNamara, R.. The valuation accuracy of the price-earnings and price-book benchmark valuation methods [J], Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 2000, (04): 349-370.
  • 4Damodaran, A.. Valuing companies with intangible assets [R.]. Working paper, 2009.
  • 5Fink, J.. How to value bank stocks [R]. Working paper, 2012.
  • 6Francis, J., Olsson, P. and Oswald, D.R.. Comparing the accuracy and explainahility of dividend, flee cash flow, and abnormal earnings equity value estimate [J]. Journal of Accounting Research, 2000, (01): 45-70.
  • 7Hoogetheide, L., Kleijn, K., Ravazzolo, F., Herman, K.V.D. and Verbeek, M.. Forecast accuracy and economic gains from Bayesian model averaging using time varying weights UI. Journal of Forecasting, 2010, (01): 251-269.
  • 8Imam, S. Chan, J. and Shah, S.Z.A.. Equity valuation models and target price accuracy in Europe: evidence from equity reports [J]. International Review of Financial Analysis, 2013, (01): 9-19.
  • 9Imam, S., Barker, K. and Clubb, C.. The use of valuation models by UK investment analysts [J]. European Accounting Review, 2008, (03): 503-535.
  • 10Jenkins, D.$.. The benefits of hybrid valuation models [J]. The CPA Journal, 2006, (01): 48-50.

共引文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部