期刊文献+

形成性评估在南桥社区全科医师培训教学模式中的效果分析

Analysis of the effectiveness of formative assessment in the training and teaching mode of the general practitioners in Nanqiao Community
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:分析上海市奉贤区南桥镇社区卫生服务中心采用的全科医师培训教学模式对全科医师诊疗能力的影响。方法:选取2020年4月—2023年1月在奉贤区南桥镇社区卫生服务中心接受中山-南桥全科培训教学模式的30名全科医师为调查对象,采用简单随机抽样方法将全科医师分为观察组和对照组各15名。两组全科医师均接受中山-南桥全科培训教学模式,培训前后分别采用客观结构化临床考核方法进行总结性评估,观察组定期采用小型临床演练评量、操作技能直接观察评量等进行形成性评估。结果:培训前两组全科医师的全科接诊能力、技能操作能力、小讲课能力得分差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),培训后观察组的全科接诊能力、技能操作能力、小讲课能力得分均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。培训后观察组的小型临床演练评量、操作技能直接观察评量所有项目得分均高于培训前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:形成性评估与总结性评估相结合的培训考核方法能够更为综合全面地评价学员的学习效果,在南桥社区全科医师培训教学模式中取得了较好的效果,值得在社区全科教学中进行推广。 Objective:To analyze the impact of the general practitioner training and teaching mode adopted by Nanqiao Community Health Service Center in Fengxian District,Shanghai on the diagnostic and treatment abilities of the general practitioners.Methods:Thirty general practitioners who received Zhongshan-Nanqiao general practice training and teaching mode at Nanqiao Community Health Service Center in Fengxian District from April 2020 to January 2023 were selected as the survey subjects.A simple random sampling method was used to divide the general practitioners into an observation group and a control group with 15 each.Both groups of the general practitioners received the Zhongshan-Nanqiao general practice training and teaching mode,and objective structured clinical assessment methods were used for summary evaluation before and after the training,the observation group regularly used small-scale clinical practice evaluation,direct observation evaluation of operational skills,and other formative evaluations.Results:There was no statistically significant difference in the scores of general practice consultation ability,skill operation ability,and small lecture ability between the two groups of the general practitioners before the training(P>0.05).After the training,the scores of general practice consultation ability,skill operation ability,and small lecture ability in the observation group were higher than those in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).After training,the observation group scored higher in all items of small-scale clinical practice evaluation and direct observation evaluation of operational skills than before training,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:The training assessment method combining formative assessment and summative assessment can comprehensively evaluate the learning effectiveness of students,and has achieved good results in the training and teaching mode of the general practitioners in Nanqiao Community,which is worth promoting in the community general practice teaching.
作者 钱燕 邱佳萍 张洁 QIAN Yan;QIU Jiaping;ZHANG Jie(Qingcun Town Community Health Service Center of Fengxian District,Shanghai 201414,China;Nanqiao Town Community Health Service Center of Fengxian District,Shanghai 201499,China;General Practice Department of Nanqiao Town Community Health Service Center of Fengxian District,Shanghai 201499,China)
出处 《上海医药》 CAS 2023年第16期14-17,共4页 Shanghai Medical & Pharmaceutical Journal
基金 上海市奉贤区科学技术委员会2019年度奉贤区(社会类)科技发展基金项目(20191402)。
关键词 形成性评估 总结性评估 全科医师 全科培训教学 formative assessment summary evaluation general practitioner general training and teaching
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献56

  • 1Harden RM, Stevenson M, Downie WW, et al. Assessment of clinical competence using objective structured examination. Br Med J, 1975, 1: 447-451.
  • 2Casey PM, Goepfert AR, Espey EL, et al. To the point: reviews in medical education--the Objective Structured Clinical Examination. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2009, 200:25-34.
  • 3Barzansky B, Etzel SI. Educational programs in US medical schools, 2003-2004. JAMA ,2004,292 : 1025-1031.
  • 4Norcini JJ,Blank LL,Arnold GK,et al.The mini-CEX (clinical evaluation exercise):a preliminary investigation.Ann Intem Med,1995,123:795-799.
  • 5Kogan JR,Bellini LM,Shea JA.Implementation of the mini-CEX to evaluate medical students clinical skills.Acad Med,2002,77:1156-1157.
  • 6Durning SJ,Cation LJ,Markert RJ,et al.Assessing the reliability and validity of the mini-clinical evaluation exercise for Internal medicine residency training.Acad Med,2002,77:900-904.
  • 7陈伟德 蔡长海 黄昆岩.临床医学教育与mini-CEX[J].医学教育,2005,:370-377.
  • 8LaMantia J.The ACGME core competencies:getting ahead of the curve.Acad Emerg Med,2002,9:1216-1217.
  • 9Carr S.The Foundation Programme assessment tools:an opportunity to enhance feedback to trainees? Postgrad Med J,2006,82:576-579.
  • 10Holmboe ES,Yepes M,Williams F,et al.Feedback and the mini clinical evaluation exercise.J Gen Intern Med,2004,19:558-561.

共引文献328

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部