期刊文献+

面向精细化的品质提升:日本城市绿色空间评价认证体系的发展与实践研究 被引量:1

Towards the Delicate Quality Improvement:Research on the Development and Practice of Urban Green Space Evaluation and Certification System in Japan
下载PDF
导出
摘要 城市绿色空间评价认证体系能够为城市绿色空间的建设提供标准,为人居环境与生态系统的耦合提供依据,为绿色空间的精细化发展助力。20世纪50—90年代,日本城市绿色空间的规划管理理念经历了从以“量”为纲的被动调控到以“效”为纲的量化探索的转变,相关机构在20世纪90年代后期开始尝试构建以“质”为纲的评价认证制度,城市绿色空间的规划管理进入精细化品质提升阶段。从制定目标、评价体系和评审机制3个方面介绍了以SEGES、JHEP和ABINC为代表的日本城市绿色空间评价体系,总结其异同,进而结合实例大手町之森展开全面立体的对比分析,最后从机制探索、制度构建和评价实施3个方面,总结了日本相关经验对中国城市绿色空间营建的借鉴意义。 Urban green space evaluation and certification systems can set standards for the construction of urban green space,provide the basis for the coupling of human settlements and ecosystems,and facilitate the delicate development of urban green space.The planning and management notion of urban green space in Japan was transformed from negative control with"quantity"to quantitative exploration with"efficiency"between the 1950s and the 1990s.Relevant institutions started to establish the evaluation and certification system based on quality since the late 1990s,which marked the entrance of delicate development stage of urban green space plan and management.The article analyzes three representative systems in Japan,namely SEGES,JHEP and ABINC,from the aspects of target,index system and evaluation mechanism.It also employs the example of Otemachi Forest to conduct an in-depth comparison.Finally,it summarizes the inspiration for China's urban green space development from the Japanese experience in aspects of mechanism exploration,system building and evaluation implementation.
作者 蒋敏 王子轶 卢峰 杨绎 JIANG Min;WANG Ziyi;LU Feng;YANG Yi
出处 《中国园林》 CSCD 北大核心 2023年第7期65-70,共6页 Chinese Landscape Architecture
基金 国家自然科学基金项目“山地城市既存环境城市形态与多层次城市设计体系建构——以重庆为例”(编号52078069) 中央高校基本科研业务费项目“山地城乡建设绿色低碳关键技术研究”(编号2022CDJXY-014) 重庆市博士后科学基金项目“山地城市商业步行街区公共空间环境要素对驻留效用的影响机制研究”(编号cstc2021jcyj-bsh0140)共同资助。
关键词 风景园林 城市绿色空间 评价认证体系 日本大手町之森 品质提升 精细化 landscape architecture urban green space evaluation and certification system Otemachi Forest in Japan quality improvement delicate
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献91

  • 1冷红(文/图).行走纽约,感受城市公共空间的魅力[J].人类居住,2020(1):36-39. 被引量:2
  • 2邹彩云,高泽梅,张乐容.植物生态学视域下的城市生态绿地建设[J].生物技术世界,2013,10(2):37-37. 被引量:1
  • 3Grimm N B, Faeth S H, Colubiewski N E, et al. Global change and the ecology of citiesUJ. Scieuce , 2008, 319(5864): 756-7611.
  • 4Nielsen T S, Hansen K B. Do green areas affect hcath? Results from a Dnn ish survey on the use of green areas and health indicators[J]. Health 8, Place, 2007, 13(4): 839-850.
  • 5Sandstrom U G. Green infrastructure planning in urban SWedl[J]. PblJl1illg Practice & Research, 2002,17(4): 373-385.
  • 6Niemela J, Saarcla S R, Soderman T, et al. Using the ecosystems services rpporuh for better planning and conservation of urban green SPTS: a Finland GISt' srudylJl. Biodiversity and COllServation, 2001, 10(11): 3225-324.
  • 7Haines-Young It, Potsch in M. The links b ctwcc-n biodiversity, ecosysrt's services and human wcll-beingIMjllRafClelli D(Eds.). Ecosystem thesis. British: Cambridge University Press, 2010: 1-31.
  • 8Dearhorn D C, Ka r k S. Motivations for conserving u rba n hiodivry[Jl Comcrvatioll Biology, 2010, 24(2): 432-440.
  • 9Pullin A S, Stewart C B. Guidelines for systematic rc vie w til cou xc r v.irron .md environnlentallnanagen Hent[J]. Conservation Biology, 2000, 20(6): 1647-1656.
  • 10Lisberg J E, Ou is P. Contested construction of nature for ciry fr ing? out do or recreation in southern Sweden: The Arrie case[J]. UrhalJ Forestry and Urh rccning, 2001, 7(4): 171-1K2.

共引文献78

同被引文献8

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部