摘要
《社会学研究》见证了中国社会学重建与崛起的全过程,研究基于《社会学研究》2000年—2021年收录的1302篇论文,借助CiteSpace软件,采用文献计量的方式分析了样本文献的关键信息,梳理了21世纪以来中国社会学的学术网络建设和知识演进脉络。研究发现,以北京大学和中国社会科学院社会学研究所为首的北京市学术机构是中国社会学研究的核心阵地,产生了一批高影响力学者和杰出成果。中国社会学的发展既受国外社会学知识的影响,同时也是回应本土问题的现实需求。其中,费孝通及其对乡土社会的关注奠定了当代中国社会学发展的根基。近些年来,转型时期的社会问题及治理日渐引起社会学者的重点关注,主要集中于社会学的本土化、国家治理、社会资本、社会分层以及劳工研究等议题。综合来看,中国社会学的发展演进呈现专业性与开放性齐头并进、国际化与本土化合力驱动的复合特征。
Sociological Studies has witnessed the whole process of the reconstruction and rise of Chinese sociology.The research is based on 1302 papers collected in Sociological Studies from 2000 to 2021.With the help of CiteSpace software,the bibliometric method is used to analyze the sample literature.Key information,and then sort out and summarize the academic network construction and knowledge evolution of Chinese sociology since the 21st century.The study found that academic institutions in Beijing,headed by Peking University and the Institute of Sociology,are the core positions of Chinese sociological research,producing a group of highly influential scholars and outstanding achievements;the development of Chinese sociology is influenced by foreign sociological knowledge influence,but also to respond to the real needs of local issues.Among them,Fei Xiaotong and his attention to rural society laid the foundation for the development of contemporary Chinese sociology.In recent years,social problems and their governance in the transition period have increasingly attracted widespread attention from sociologists,mainly focusing on the localization of sociology,state governance,social capital,social stratification,and labor studies.On the whole,the development and evolution of Chinese sociology presents a composite feature of professionalism and openness going hand in hand,and the combined force of internationalization and localization.
作者
吴朝进
Wu Zhaojin(School of Philosophy and Sociology,Jilin University,Changchun,Jinlin 130000)
出处
《宁夏社会科学》
2023年第4期141-154,共14页
NingXia Social Sciences
关键词
《社会学研究》
中国社会学
学术网络
知识演进
文献计量
Sociological Studies
Chinese sociology
academic network
knowledge evolution
bibliometrics